Home› Main Category› Hunting
bullsi1911
Posts: 12,454 Senior Member
Revolver and Handgun Hunters- Step inside, please

As a 'baby step' into a full handrifle hunting setup, I took my .454 Super Redhawk...
and slapped on a used Bushnell scope from the Gunshow yesterday
Now, I need some advice. First- this will be at max, shot at 150 yards at Texas Hill country Whitetail. Nothing too big or extreme.
I have been running Cabelas bulk "HSM" ammo. I have all the stuff to handload .454. Any suggestions on either factory loads or handload recipes?
The majority of the shots will be probably 70-100 yards. I'll probably sight it in at 100 yards, unless there is a good reason to go with a different distance.
Any other things I need to know or think about before I get too deep into this?
and slapped on a used Bushnell scope from the Gunshow yesterday
Now, I need some advice. First- this will be at max, shot at 150 yards at Texas Hill country Whitetail. Nothing too big or extreme.
I have been running Cabelas bulk "HSM" ammo. I have all the stuff to handload .454. Any suggestions on either factory loads or handload recipes?
The majority of the shots will be probably 70-100 yards. I'll probably sight it in at 100 yards, unless there is a good reason to go with a different distance.
Any other things I need to know or think about before I get too deep into this?
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Replies
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Won't give the powder load because the FA will handle more pressure than a Ruger typically.
It was death every time.
Find way to shoot from the seated position using shooting sticks or a tri-pod like Bog-Gear makes.
"The Un-Tactical"
For starters, get yourself a keg of H110. I have several .44 mags that I load for also and H110 is my go to powder for full power loads for my big revolvers. If you want to shoot jacketed bullets, the only real choice for a full power loading is the Speer 300gr GDHP. (#3974) That bullet was made specifically for the casull as it has a thicker jacket to withstand the higher pressures of the .454. A weaker bullet won't allow the pressure to build up enough for a complete powder burn and can increase flame cutting of the top strap. This is not theory, I have a noticable groove on mine from some factory rounds that I was using when I first bought mine. I have a 300gr RNFPGC that I cast at a 22 bhn that is much cheaper to shoot than the Speers but I haven't shot anything with them yet. I use 30gr of H110 with either bullet and the Speer manual shows 31.5gr of H110 as being a max load but 30gr gets the job done for me. With my cast bullet I get 1455fps out of my SRH and I get 2" at 50yds from my shooting sticks. I haven't stretched it out any further or tried it off of a more solid rest but for me, that's plenty good enough for deer. One other thing that I will add is that you need to crimp the heck out of the bullets. I mean really pronounced as to you're almost buckling the cases. Yeah this will shorten the life of the cases but oh well. Two things happen if you don't crimp enough, inefficient burn and flame cutting of the topstrap, and after about three shots the remaining rounds in the cylinder will pull and lockup the cylinder. This has happened to me more than I care to admit and for a while I was hunting with only three rounds in it because of this. Also as everyone else has mentioned, IT'S LOUD!
FWIW, mine run 1525fps out of my 7.5" SRH, and zeroed at 25 yards, they're 4" low at 100.
Hang on, have fun.
After I posted this, I wondered if Dick passed away, a call to Freedom Arms then.
"The Un-Tactical"
The .454 is really not that bad in recoil when the gun weighs 3.5 lbs PLUS scope and rings.
Thanks for the advice, everyone. I am looking forward to trying this out, and hunting 'light'
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
One of those shoulder holsters for those scoped cannons probably be about as good as it gets. Keeps the weight on your shoulders, and keeps the gun where you can still get it out of the holster for a quick shot, should that be necessary.
"The Un-Tactical"
http://ringlercustomleather.com/catalog/i2.html
LOL.
Finally getting to the range tomorrow at lunch. If it works well, I may try and take a buck with it this weekend on the last hunt of buck season.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
http://www.shop.diamonddcustomleather.com/Guides-Choice-Chest-Holster-GC.htm
-96 lbs
I haven't actually shot anything with mine, yet. I'll say this, though. I'm a big fan of cast bullets, also. I love them. I'm using the XTP's in hopes of getting some expansion. There's not a doubt in my mind that a 300gr hardcast will bore straight through a whitetail.
I used one of these for a holser on my deer hunt last year. Uncle Mike's camo bandolier.
I put the holster on first, then my jacket, then my pack and I was ready to go. A lot of walking, spot and stalk syle hunting. Well, a lot of walking with no spotting in any case. Point being, I was comfortable the entire time. If I got warm, I could take my pack off, take my jacket off and put it in the pack and put the pack back on, all while leaving the gun holstered. I have electronic hearing protection, but didn't really like wearing them. I just left them clamped on my head so I could slip them down on my ears with my left hand while drawing with my right.
With my setup, sighted in about 1 inch high at 25 yards, I was able to consistently hit paper plates out to 150 yards. That's about as far as I went with my load work and practice, thinking that being able to hit a paper plate with a dead on hold out to just about 150 yards or so was good enough to go deer hunting with. Of course, things will change with a different gun, scope height and load.
I can't remember off hand what my powder charges and velocities were. I was using W296 with the 240 and 300 grian bullets I mentioned. CCI small rifle primers. When I get home this evening I'll look at my log to see what my powder charges were and the chronograph info I got, if it woudl be helpful. I also loaded some slightly milder loads with those same bullets using Accurate 9 powder. They were extremely accurate and less felt recoil, but velocity fell off. For 100 yards and in, I would really consider that load for the reduced recoil. I'm guessing in my case the better accuracy likely came from the reduced recoil more than anything.
Was not able to get to the range. There was an HOUR wait to get a lane. Damnit.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
A fairly mild AA9 load like I mentined before - 300 grain XTP mag bullet, 25 grains of Accurate Arms No. 9 powder, CCI small rifle primer = averaged 1510 FPS, std dev 12fps. COAL=1.765"
Another fairly mild load like I mentioned before - 240 grain XTP mag, 28.5 grains of AA9 powder, CCI small rifle primer = averaged 1729 FPS, std dev 13 FPS. COAL=1.745"
The load that I actually carried to hunt with but haven't shot anything but rabbits with - 240 XTP Mag, 36.7 grains of W296 powder, CCI small rifle primer = averaged 1847 FPS, std dev 27 FPS. COAL=1.745"
[public disclaimer] Of course, double check published data and make sure these loads are safe for your application. :jester:
Just remembered: this is the load I used in the handpounder class at the last 25 yard target shoot I was in and won. Shot 5 in a group to verify my sights, then shot 50 of them for score in 5 shot groups. No problem. Figured, if I couldn't beat the other guys, just make them flinch.........:jester:
Edit - My bad. It's good you got me looking into this again. The load I used in my 25 yard shoot was this load, but with 30.0 grains of AA9. Haven't chronographed that one, but it was a good load as well.