It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
5280 shooter II wrote: »
My answer is: No for both questions. Power is relative as you're comparing light and fast to heavier and slower.....but it's all an excercise in kenetic energy, isn't it...E=MCsqd....comparing apples to apples......an M-16 will still be more accurate than an AK-74, because of the firing platform, not the bullet alone.
9mm VS .45 cal....one is no more accurate than the other.....accuracy here falls upon the shooter and the platform. My Glock 23/19 (.40 & 9mm), Sig 229 .40 S&W, CZ-97 and S&W 1911 (.45) all print golf ball size groups while benched.....tennis ball sized groups freehand in isoceles stance. My revolvers in .357 and .44 are on par as well.
Light and fast VS heavy and slower also equates to rifle rounds as well....last month I killed an elk with a 150 gr Hornady Interloc from a .300 winmag, it did the job, but the organs and bullet construction stopped the bullet in the heart.....had the bullet been a Barnes TTSX, I'm sure it would have gone straight through the animal. You seeing my point yet?
Man, some of y'all's skin got a little thin over the holidays ya Nancys.....:tooth: However Killpilla, you could've done better w/o the first sentence. Never, ever, approach ANY public forum with a "just the facts ma'am" attitude......you're just begging to get your marshmellow burnt.
breamfisher wrote: »
Oh, boo freakin' hoo. Both of your threads have started the same way: acting as though the folks here who respond might not know what they're talking about. I'd suggest some Tuck's medicated pads.
BTW, did you read the actual answers?
killpilla wrote: »
Well, if you re read my opening post you'll see I was rather polite and only asking if someone knowledgeable would reply cause we all know the internet is available to anyone AND we all know that people who dont know will go online and act like they know.
killpilla wrote: »
Um yeah and only seen maybe 2 that meant anything to me. Now I realize My WORDING may have not been the best but it's not my fault yall want to start a fight.
And let me add, the reason I worded it that way (and the other post as well:) is cause to often I've seen people hear something from someone or read something somewhere and turned and spread it like gospel with out actually knowing all the facts or the whole story. I dont remember there being a requirement to shooting knowledge or "time on range" before having to join the site, therefore anyone can join and anyone who thinks he knows can answer. Luckily the only response I got was from you all, thanks. But all in all. It's been fun. Here's something for you guys to fight for since you all seem so angry, it dont take long to fill out.
Watch the video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDglpt8hpyg
Start here to fight the fight:http://www.congress.org/congressorg/mail/?alertid=61046526&type=ML
Temporary Price Reduction
Give a Gift
PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE
Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.