Home› Main Category› General Firearms
Zee
Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
Handloading the .44 Mag - Help/Recommendations

Alright, I have brass/dies/bullets/powder ready to go for the .44 Mag. Unfortunately, no primers yet. But, the brass is prepped and ready to go whenever I find some primers.
I've been putting off loading the .44 (hence not having primers & powder) because it just wasn't a priority or necessity at the time. Well, I've got nothing else to do, so I might as well start with the .44 Mag.
I am using the following:
H110
Remington Brass
Hornady 240gr XTP
RCBS Carbide Dies
I'll pretty much take what I can get when it comes to primers since there ain't none.
Questions:
- I didn't chamfer/debur/uniform the primer pocket of the brass. Should I? This is only a 100-150 yards hndgun. Is all that necessary?
- Do I follow book specs for seating depth? I wouldn't assume it is like rifles where you can seat bullets according to your chamber. Does one even PLAY with seating depth? Or, is it pretty much a fixed concept (fits in cylinder)?
- I have 3 handguns and 1 levergun. I don't want to load specifically for all three. I plan to stick pretty close to book specs and load using my Ruger 7.5" Super Blackhawk Hunter Bisley, since it wears a 2x scope. I can expect a load worked up in the Bisley to be functional in another Super Blackhawk, a S&W Mountain Gun, and a Marlin 1894.......even if not ideal........right?
- Testing loads at 50yrds with a 2x scope......I desire reasonable accuracy and as much umph as I can get. I want stout loads but not dangerous. Do you accomplish this the same as a rifle?
*Start a grain and a half below max and load up in half grain increments with book seating depth. Or, do I use less charge weight spreads?
*Go to range and shoot lowest load for accuracy (3 round groups) at 50 yards. Then, shoot higher loads until max load is reached.
*Settle on load with most power and acceptable accuracy.
Is this the way, or is it different than a rifle and I need to be doing something else?
Help!!!!!!
I've been putting off loading the .44 (hence not having primers & powder) because it just wasn't a priority or necessity at the time. Well, I've got nothing else to do, so I might as well start with the .44 Mag.
I am using the following:
H110
Remington Brass
Hornady 240gr XTP
RCBS Carbide Dies
I'll pretty much take what I can get when it comes to primers since there ain't none.
Questions:
- I didn't chamfer/debur/uniform the primer pocket of the brass. Should I? This is only a 100-150 yards hndgun. Is all that necessary?
- Do I follow book specs for seating depth? I wouldn't assume it is like rifles where you can seat bullets according to your chamber. Does one even PLAY with seating depth? Or, is it pretty much a fixed concept (fits in cylinder)?
- I have 3 handguns and 1 levergun. I don't want to load specifically for all three. I plan to stick pretty close to book specs and load using my Ruger 7.5" Super Blackhawk Hunter Bisley, since it wears a 2x scope. I can expect a load worked up in the Bisley to be functional in another Super Blackhawk, a S&W Mountain Gun, and a Marlin 1894.......even if not ideal........right?
- Testing loads at 50yrds with a 2x scope......I desire reasonable accuracy and as much umph as I can get. I want stout loads but not dangerous. Do you accomplish this the same as a rifle?
*Start a grain and a half below max and load up in half grain increments with book seating depth. Or, do I use less charge weight spreads?
*Go to range and shoot lowest load for accuracy (3 round groups) at 50 yards. Then, shoot higher loads until max load is reached.
*Settle on load with most power and acceptable accuracy.
Is this the way, or is it different than a rifle and I need to be doing something else?
Help!!!!!!
"To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
Replies
AKA: Former Founding Member
The only problem I see with working loads with the Mountain gun is determining accuracy. It got pretty big sights and would have to shoot at 25 yards. Even at that, I don't know that I could reliably distinguish a difference in accuracy between loads unless it was drastic. At 25 yards with the defensive sights, the difference between a 1.5" load and a 2" load or even 2.5" could be hard to determine if it was the load or shooter error.
At least with the Ruger and 2x scope, I can be pretty sure of the accuracy of a given load.
Don't sweat the primer pockets.
Edit. My 454, 45Colt, and 44 all shoot cloverleafs with H110 and XTP's, at .2 under max
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/563825/lee-carbide-factory-crimp-die-44-special-44-remington-magnum
You will thank me later.
I have one for my .30-30 and .458 WM. haven't used the .458 yet. But, that's next.
I don't understand what it means by "sizes" and "crimps" at the same time. I thought sizing was in brass prep prior to seating a bullet. How do you size and crimp a case with a bullet in it.
Im obviously missing something.
Think I understand now.
Again, you're costing me money. "imoit:
Nah, there is no rush. I just finally got around to my straight wall cases. Basically, ran out if excuses. There is no rush or worry. I'll find primers when I find them. I have plenty of factory ammo anyway for now.
Just figured I'd procrastinated long enough.
And an odd thing is Winchester 296 is the same powder, but has no such warnings!
I used to use a lot of Winchester primers that say on the box, for magnum or standard loads.
A heavy crimp is recommended to prevent bullet jump in the adjacent loaded cylinder charge holes and you can adjust the amount of crimp even on Lee FCD's.
Blue Dot, H-110, 2400 and 296 are all good .44 mag powders. Plenty others will work fer target and medium loads. I have a One Caliber load book/pamphlet for the .44 Magnum, lots of load data with just about every bullet/powder combination you can think of, including Ruger/TC/Rifle loads.
Have fun :guns::guns:
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
D
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.... now who's bringing the hot wings? :jester:
Edited to add: disregard info. See here:
http://forums.gunsandammo.com/showthread.php?15039-Handloading-the-44-Mag-Help-Recommendations&p=254564&viewfull=1#post254564
Understood, but somehow the hammer strike from a Ruger seems like it would be plenty And surely the 1894 should have enough oooomf in the hammer to set of a rifle primer. Perhaps that is just my imagination. I could see the problem with a 3.5 or 5.5 lb Glock trigger on a G20 or G22, but I don't have any experience with it.
D
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.... now who's bringing the hot wings? :jester:
It may be possible to use large rifle primers in a pistol case if the primer will seat deep enough to prevent it's hanging on the recoil shield when the cylinder rotates , or conversely having an AD when the bolt on the rifle closes.
I have used large rifle primers in 45 colt cases using +P loads in both the Ruger and the Winchester and had no problems with them.
Ok Ok I'll go back in the corner
You pretty much can't go wron with the XTP bullets. Those bullets are to handgun loading what Amax's are to rifle loading. Very hard to beat for the price. I almost exclusively use those bullets and H110/W296 and Accurate No. 9 powders. I just haven't had the need to try anything else.
In my opinion, as far as accuracy with handgun rounds like this go, the most important things are consistent case length and consistent crimp. The two are generally related to each other. After that, charge weight consistency. Seating depth for me has never been something I mess with. I don't think it makes enough of a difference, except that it's consistent and the crimp groove pretty much determines seating depth anyway. I personally ususally start about mid way or so in the book powder charge range and work loads up in .5 grain increments up to book max. I load up enough to test, shooting 5-shot groups at 25 yards with iron sighted revolvers. For many of my revolvers, I'm not worried about much past 25 yards, so I look for sub 1.5" or so for 5 rounds at that range. When I started working with the 454 Casull and now the 460 Smith with a scope, I've started working on tightening that up and shooting groups out to 100 yards. That is a work in progress for me. I am the limiting factor in that equation, not my loads.
You will gernally also find two different sets of load data for a rounds like this. Regular load data and Thompson Center/Ruger only loads. Of course, the TC-Ruger loads are a bit stouter than other loads. While those loads are, of course, generally safe for a Blackhawk or whatever, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that those loads were safe for a lever action.
Also, as far as working up loads in straight wall cases, I don't believe it's a good practice to pick a starting point and work up unitl you see whatever you're looking for. By the time you start to see signs of pressure in handgun rounds or straight wall cases in general, you've long ago past the safe pressure limit and you're probably getting ready to have a problem. With powders like H110, you generally won't have much room left in the case. But other powders, like AA 9, will easily allow an overcharge.
My $.02
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Wasn't planning to reduce. I usually start 1.5gr below book max in rifles. Planned to do the same with the .44 unless its a bad idea.
In the Hornady Manual, a starting load is 20.7gr and a max load is 24.8gr. I'll likely drop to 23.5 (mid-range load) and go to 25.0 in .5gr incriments. Once I find the most accurate of those 4 different loads, I might tweak .2gr if I'm not completely satisfied. But, I'm not going to waste powder starting that way.