Home Main Category General Firearms

7mm Remington Ultra Mag Range Report

ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
I got "The Sister" awhile back, as you might remember. I've been waiting for a gifted stock to arrive before any real range work. Well, it finally did.

Choate Tactical

7RUM1stLoadWork17.jpg

7RUM1stLoadWork19.jpg

It's a beast of a stock with a full length aluminum bedding block surrounded by 80/20 polypropylene/fiberglass, a forend rail system, and 4 QD sling studs. Don't know the weight of the actual stock, but the shipping was 6 pounds and the rifle set up as so weighs 12 pounds with a sporter barrel. It's a haus!

I was unable to find any load data using Retumbo and 162gr A-Max bullets, so I went off Hodgdon data for the 162gr Hornady PSPBT. Max load listed was 95gr of Retumbo. So, I started at 94gr and went up in .5 grain increments to 95.5 grains.

7mmRUM1stLoads9.jpg

94gr / 94.5gr / 95gr / 95.5gr

7mmRUM1stLoads11.jpg

Seating depth is somewhat of an issue with this chambering. As you might recall, Remington gives this chambering 10mm of freebore in an attempt to create a pressure chamber for the bullet. Well, I don't want that. So, seated out about as far as I can, I still can't touch the lands.

7mmRUM1stLoads12.jpg

As you can see, only half the bearing surface is in contact with the case neck. Seated as such, I obviously can't use the rifles magazine. That is no big deal. Only issue is that I can't extract a loaded round without pulling the bolt out with the bolt release. Oh well.

At the range, the stock is rather comfortable and stable. The wide forend rides the front rest well.........

7RUM1stLoadWork6.jpg

........and the cut out in the butt stock rides the rear bag. Very nice, actually.

7RUM1stLoadWork5.jpg

It's a very LONG stock overall, which I like. With the adjustable length of pull, I was able to take a spacer out and make it a little mo betta for me.

Group wise, just as the "Other Sister" or .300 RUM did, this rifle likes max loads and more. At the 95gr book max, I was seeing and feeling no pressure and the group was looking pretty good. So, I went ahead to .5gr over max and fired the 95.5gr loads.

7RUM955grRetumbo162grA-Max.jpg

Now, the off round was the third shot. It did it on the previous groups as well. I tend to think that by the 3rd shot, the barrel is getting pretty stupid hot and throwing the last round. I was allowing the rifle to cool between groups, but not between shots. I think I will need to allow the barrel to cool a bit between shots as it seems the last round is suffering. At least.........that's my story.

So, I am happy with the preliminary tests.

Going to load up another batch of the 95.5gr loads as is. I will also load a batch of the same powder charge, but seat the bullets so the bearing surface is at the base of the neck. Just to see if there is a difference in accuracy. Once I get an accurate load, I'll chronograph it to get an idea of the velocity.

Once all the load work is done, I'll paint the stock.

Oh, gonna try some 160gr Speer Hot-Cor bullets as well. They don't seem to shoot in anything else I have. Might as well try them in this one too.

The 162gr A-Max has always done well for me, though.

7mm162grA-MaxComparrison3.jpg

7mm-08
.280 Remington
7mm Remington Ultra Mag
"To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
«13456

Replies

  • BigDanSBigDanS Posts: 6,992 Senior Member
    What is the purpose of this rifle?

    Seating the bullets half in the neck bearing surface seems counter intuitive. First, you have turned that gun into a single shot rifle, and second, how stable are those bullets in the casings when there is just half the neck to stabilize them? If the did fit in your magazine I am betting recoil might change their COAL.

    Looks like fun and I bet that thing is loud. Almost 100 gr of powder! About 2x of what I stick in the 30-06. Did you chrony the loads?

    D
    "A patriot is mocked, scorned and hated; yet when his cause succeeds, all men will join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain
    Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.... now who's bringing the hot wings? :jester:
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Wait, it needs a purpose?!!!

    Ha! Truth be told, I got the rifle because someone gave me 200 rounds of ammunition. Ever done that before? Hehehehe.

    I was planning to build a fast 7mm anyway. Once I burn this barrel out and shoot the life out of the brass, I'll rebarrel to 7mm STW in a heavy barrel. Until then, it'll be a LR deer rifle.

    Most of my bolt guns are single shot rifles due to seating the heavy for caliber bullet, long. Hasn't bothered me yet. Only need one shot anyway, right?

    ill chrono the loads once I find the most accurate one.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    knitepoet wrote: »
    Not bad at all Zedrick :beer:

    However, see Linefinder's quote in my sigline :nono:

    Well, since I'm far from coke can quantity of powder..............I must be good to go.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • JermanatorJermanator Posts: 16,244 Senior Member
    Looks good. And you did all that shooting while wearing a skirt?
    Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.
    -Thomas Paine
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    knitepoet wrote: »
    edited to add: Or, you're BURNING about the same amount of $$ as you're "launching" down range

    you have the high speed program, what's my burn ratio out of a 26" barrel?

    Am I launching half as much as I burn?

    Cash? Ain't like its a high volume rifle.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Jermanator wrote: »
    Looks good. And you did all that shooting while wearing a skirt?

    Breeze was nice.

    ;-)
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Well, if cost of components dictated what and how much we shot...........we'd all be shooting .22 lr.

    No, wait. That's not necessarily true anymore.

    :-)
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • jbohiojbohio Posts: 5,619 Senior Member
    Nice!
    I'd be curious to see the velocity difference between the long and short rounds. If there is any.
    How's she now in the recoil dept? I remember you said it was pretty lively before.
  • rapier5316rapier5316 Posts: 312 Member
    What is that can company with the great

    Brake and can adaptor?
    "The power of the United States has peaked, oppression follows." Robert Prector, Socionomics.net
  • LinefinderLinefinder Posts: 7,856 Senior Member
    Has anybody mentioned you might want to read Paul's sigline?:tooth:
    Mike
    "Walking away seems to be a lost art form."
    N454casull
  • LinefinderLinefinder Posts: 7,856 Senior Member
    knitepoet wrote: »
    Zedrick, shows 100% powder burn, and ballistic efficiency of 22.3%

    22.3% sucks....kinda.....there's worse, but not by much.

    Mike
    "Walking away seems to be a lost art form."
    N454casull
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Linefinder wrote: »
    Has anybody mentioned you might want to read Paul's sigline?:tooth:
    Mike

    You might want to read mine.

    :-)
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    jbohio wrote: »
    Nice!
    I'd be curious to see the velocity difference between the long and short rounds. If there is any.
    How's she now in the recoil dept? I remember you said it was pretty lively before.

    Im curious on the velocity difference as well. Maybe the greater bearing surface of seating deeper will result in an increased velocity. I've seen that in the past.

    Recoil is painless but still abrupt. Less than before, though.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • timctimc Posts: 6,684 Senior Member
    knitepoet wrote: »
    You're up in the "less than 75 rounds per pound of powder" range, which is close enough to "coke can full" for me :p


    edited to add: Or, you're BURNING about the same amount of $$ as you're "launching" down range

    The powder issue is one of the reasons I dumped my .300 ultra mag a few years ago.

    Zee, I do like the looks of the rifle!
    timc - formerly known as timc on the last G&A forum and timc on the G&A forum before that and the G&A forum before that.....
    AKA: Former Founding Member
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    cpj wrote: »
    Are there sling swivels on the other side too?

    I like the looks, save for the butt pad.

    Yes.

    Not the greatest looking recoil pad, I agree. Might look to change that, down the road.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    rapier5316 wrote: »
    What is that can company with the great

    Brake and can adaptor?

    Surefire? Is that what your asking?
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    Not bad for a factory barrel.
    Good shooting as normal and expected.
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    That stock makes it look sorta kinda like a Savage. :tooth:

    What's the recoil feel like? Wow, 95.5 grains of pulver (That's **** fer gunpowder) Lets see I can load/you could load almost 4 rounds of .223 and over 2 rounds of .308 and about 2X .270s and so on.

    One pound = 7000 grains divided by 95.5 = 73.298 per pound of powder. I imagine it would take quite a few range visits to burn up that much ammo in that rifle.

    From Hodgdon's website. I would think you will get somewhere around 3100-3200 FPS when you Chrony your loads.

    Wow, over 500 FPS more than a .270 shooting 160 grain Noslers. And a few hundred FPS over a .270 Weatherby Magnum. Even shuts out the 7mm STW.

    Very interesting, I have no need or desire for such a chambering, but do have to :applause::applause: you on your various caliber quests/endeavors and the results you get :guns::guns:

    162 GR. HDY SPBT Hodgdon US 869 .284" 3.650" 100.5 3075 58,700 PSI 103.5 3173 62,800 PSI
    162 GR. HDY SPBT Hodgdon H50BMG .284" 3.650" 94.0 2979 56,000 PSI 100.0 3119 62,600 PSI
    162 GR. HDY SPBT Hodgdon Retumbo .284" 3.650" 89.0 3009 53,100 PSI 95.0 3223 62,700 PSI
    162 GR. HDY SPBT Hodgdon H1000 .284" 3.650" 84.0 2993 55,600 PSI 89.0 3127 62,500 PSI
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    I assuredly have no 'need' for this cartridge and until the ammo offer, no real desire. But, as I said, who turns down free ammo??!!! Haha!
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    I'm running roughly the same amount if powder (95.5)gr in this rifle to push a 162gr bullet as I am out of my .300 RUM. In that rifle, I use 96gr of Retumbo to push a 208gr bullet 3,160 fps. Will be interesting to see the velocity difference in the two rifles for the same amount of powder, roughly.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • jbohiojbohio Posts: 5,619 Senior Member
    Big Chief wrote: »
    That stock makes it look sorta kinda like a Savage. :tooth:

    What's the recoil feel like? Wow, 95.5 grains of pulver (That's **** fer gunpowder) Lets see I can load/you could load almost 4 rounds of .223 and over 2 rounds of .308 and about 2X .270s and so on.

    One pound = 7000 grains divided by 95.5 = 73.298 per pound of powder. I imagine it would take quite a few range visits to burn up that much ammo in that rifle.

    From Hodgdon's website. I would think you will get somewhere around 3100-3200 FPS when you Chrony your loads.

    Wow, over 500 FPS more than a .270 shooting 160 grain Noslers. And a few hundred FPS over a .270 Weatherby Magnum. Even shuts out the 7mm STW.

    Very interesting, I have no need or desire for such a chambering, but do have to :applause::applause: you on your various caliber quests/endeavors and the results you get :guns::guns:

    I have a picture that shows what the recoil feels like! :tooth:

    The RUM family isn't for the weak of shoulder, but if you want to put the ultimate hammer on something, there isn't an equal. The 338 & 375 versions are monsters!

    MHS remarked that of all the elk he's seen shot, both in person and on TV, he's never seen one go down as fast as the one I shot with my 300 RUM last year. It went maybe 30 yards at a run, and dropped dead.
  • Big Al1Big Al1 Posts: 8,814 Senior Member
    Nice groups and that looks like a real smoker. Any idea on velocities? My STW gets about 3250 with 160's and 3400 with 140's. I think I was loading about 82-84 grains of 7828.
    Is that one of those bullet tip melters??
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Big Al1 wrote: »
    Nice groups and that looks like a real smoker. Any idea on velocities? My STW gets about 3250 with 160's and 3400 with 140's. I think I was loading about 82-84 grains of 7828.
    Is that one of those bullet tip melters??

    Once I get an accurate load, I'll test the velocity.

    I think I've got the powder charge. Going to verify the charge and see if I can seat deeper and maintain the accuracy. Also, want to see the difference in velocity between seating deep and long with the same powder charge.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    How does your shoulder feel?
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    If you want to tweak more, you may change primer brand.
    Just one of the other ways to find a sweet spot.
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Not looking for a sweet spot. I think I'm there. Just going to confirm. Besides, I have 1,000 of the primers I have. Ain't switching now.
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,409 Senior Member
    Big Chief wrote: »
    How does your shoulder feel?

    Recoil isn't bad. Heck, the gun weighs 12 pounds!!!
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    Zee wrote: »
    Not looking for a sweet spot. I think I'm there. Just going to confirm. Besides, I have 1,000 of the primers I have. Ain't switching now.

    Understood
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • centermass556centermass556 Posts: 3,618 Senior Member
    Zee wrote: »
    ?...... Until then, it'll be a LR deer rifle......

    I was home on leave and borrowed my uncle's 7 mm RUM for a quick day hunt. I want to say I had 150gr rounds...I shot a doe at ~ 275m. I pulled the shot and went through a little high in the lungs. She dropped like a rock, not from the poor shot...but because the round broke her back!!
    "To have really lived, you must have almost died. To those who have fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know."
  • twatwa Posts: 2,245 Senior Member
    I was home on leave and borrowed my uncle's 7 mm RUM for a quick day hunt. I want to say I had 150gr rounds...I shot a doe at ~ 275m. I pulled the shot and went through a little high in the lungs. She dropped like a rock, not from the poor shot...but because the round broke her back!!

    Yep, I have had the same experience with my 7mm RUM, the few I have shot with it leave GAPING EXIT HOLES.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement