I would not be interested because of the lower weight of the revolver as compared to a N frame.
Agreed. My Redhawk is about as light as I'm comfortable with shooting full-house magnums; I've shot my buddy's Super Blackhawk and it dang near busted my knuckle. Can't imagine shooting an L-frame .44 mag.
“A gun is a tool, no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.”
Has anybody put their hands on this new revolver? It has peaked my interest just a little.
There's a write-up on the new L-frame .44 mag. S&W is the latest (May) issue of Shooting Times magazine. It looks like
it may be a good carry gun. Just a 5 shooter though. It's lighter than the N.
Probably a great carry gun, but not a very pleasant shooting gun.
I carry my 29. Dies are on the way and I'm looking for bullets and a jug or two of 2400. I need some more comfortable loads. So I can say from experience, the only way I'd want a lightweight .44 mag is if I had lighter loads or it magically changed back to N frame weight when I drew it.
And before some He-Man type weighs in, it ain't the stout recoil so much as trying to get the front sight back on target.
Teach your children to love guns, they'll never be able to afford drugs
I shoot .44 Specials out of my 29 and am quite happy with it. I have it holstered in a "taker" style shoulder holster, and it's still pretty damn heavy. I DO NOT like heavy recoil.
Concealed carry is for protection, open carry is for attention.
Load them up at 1000-1100 FPS, more than a .44 Spl and less than a full-house .44 Mag. Will take care of about anything you need it to and easier on you and the revolver.
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Load them up at 1000-1100 FPS, more than a .44 Spl and less than a full-house .44 Mag. Will take care of about anything you need it to and easier on you and the revolver.
Thats where I load my 44spl to (1050 fps 255gr) and in a full sized SA they are nice.
Thats where I load my 44spl to (1050 fps 255gr) and in a full sized SA they are nice.
Sounds like a good load.
I load my 624s up over the anemic factory .44 spls being essentially Mountain Gun N frames with shorter cylinders, but I don't push them, I have 629s for magnums.
The old standby with a .44 mag for target/general purpose knockabout was 8 grains of Unique under a 240 grain cast bullet. I always used 9-10 grains to give them a little more whomp :tooth:
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
My thoughts on this gun run in a different direction. Round butt and 2.5 inch barrel and we're talking.
Not an L frame, but an N frame, I own something sorta like you speak about. A 629 with a 3" bbl and RB/unfluted cylinder. It's a 6 shot and can be a handful, but manageable enough to a point. Lets say 20-30 shots and fatigue/ flinching sets in with full house loads. I have managed 50 at one range visit in the past. It sure lets you know you are shootin a .44 Remington Magnum.
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
The top revolver is my 3" Unfluted cylinder round-butt 629, I thunk it's stamped EE for Endurance Enhancements by the SN# or something. About as compact as I wanna go in a .44 magnum.
Middle is my 4" model 624 and bottom is a 61/2" 624 both in .44 Special only.
[IMG][/img]
And here is Teach shootin my 629 Classic scoped.
[IMG][/img]
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
“A gun is a tool, no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.”
Has anybody put their hands on this new revolver? It has peaked my interest just a little.
Looks like Durwood did on another thread.
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Replies
Agreed. My Redhawk is about as light as I'm comfortable with shooting full-house magnums; I've shot my buddy's Super Blackhawk and it dang near busted my knuckle. Can't imagine shooting an L-frame .44 mag.
NRA Endowment Member
There's a write-up on the new L-frame .44 mag. S&W is the latest (May) issue of Shooting Times magazine. It looks like
it may be a good carry gun. Just a 5 shooter though. It's lighter than the N.
I carry my 29. Dies are on the way and I'm looking for bullets and a jug or two of 2400. I need some more comfortable loads. So I can say from experience, the only way I'd want a lightweight .44 mag is if I had lighter loads or it magically changed back to N frame weight when I drew it.
And before some He-Man type weighs in, it ain't the stout recoil so much as trying to get the front sight back on target.
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Thats where I load my 44spl to (1050 fps 255gr) and in a full sized SA they are nice.
I'm with you. An upscaled SP-101, so to speak. I'd be all over that.
Sounds like a good load.
I load my 624s up over the anemic factory .44 spls being essentially Mountain Gun N frames with shorter cylinders, but I don't push them, I have 629s for magnums.
The old standby with a .44 mag for target/general purpose knockabout was 8 grains of Unique under a 240 grain cast bullet. I always used 9-10 grains to give them a little more whomp :tooth:
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Not an L frame, but an N frame, I own something sorta like you speak about. A 629 with a 3" bbl and RB/unfluted cylinder. It's a 6 shot and can be a handful, but manageable enough to a point. Lets say 20-30 shots and fatigue/ flinching sets in with full house loads. I have managed 50 at one range visit in the past. It sure lets you know you are shootin a .44 Remington Magnum.
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Middle is my 4" model 624 and bottom is a 61/2" 624 both in .44 Special only.
[IMG][/img]
And here is Teach shootin my 629 Classic scoped.
[IMG][/img]
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
Hush.
NRA Endowment Member
Looks like Durwood did on another thread.
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!