Forums

Forum Menu
Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics

Eric Holder resigning YEAH>>>>>>>>>>>>

Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
in Second Amendment/Politics #1
Just heard........................will announce. About dang time.

:beer::beer::beer::applause::applause::applause::applause::applause:

Of course, what will Obammy replace him with????
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
· Share on TwitterShare on Facebook

Replies

  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    #2
    I won't be celebrating until I know who's replacing him....
    Meh.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    #3
    I hope Janet Reno ain't coming outta retirement.......:cuss::cuss::yikes::yikes::yikes:
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    #4
    Big Chief wrote: »
    I hope Janet Reno ain't coming outta retirement.......:cuss::cuss::yikes::yikes::yikes:
    See....

    I'm not going to shed a tear over him going, but until we know who the replacement is, I'm cautious. Heck, who knows why he's leaving. Could be he's going somewhere he could have more "impact."
    Meh.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • PFDPFD Posts: 1,898 Senior Member
    #5
    breamfisher wrote: »
    I won't be celebrating until I know who's replacing him....

    And that he's not doing this in preparation of taking some higher office.

    I cannot imagine what it might be but I just can't believe that the Country would have the good fortune for this butt clown to fade away.
    That's all I got.

    Paul
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • bisleybisley Posts: 10,815 Senior Member
    #6
    I did so hope to see him behind bars.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • RazorbackerRazorbacker Posts: 4,646 Senior Member
    #7
    Here's a link I found

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/26/us/politics/eric-holder-resigning-as-attorney-general.html?_r=0

    Only about 6 years late.
    Teach your children to love guns, they'll never be able to afford drugs
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • shootbrownelkshootbrownelk Posts: 2,035 Senior Member
    #8
    I heard that O'bummer wanted to appoint him as a Federal Judge.....OMG!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,747 Senior Member
    #9
    There is either a plan to move him into a what I consinder more damaging position to our Country or something is ready to come out that Obama needs to distance himself from.
    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • samzheresamzhere Posts: 10,923 Senior Member
    #10
    shootbrownelk wrote: »
    I heard that O'bummer wanted to appoint him as a Federal Judge.....OMG!

    Don't doubt for one second that his replacement will be any less of a zealot than Holder is.

    And, gang, this is why we MUST overturn the Democrat majority in the Senate in November: Can you imagine Eric Holder nominated and approved for the Supreme Court?

    Picture 2 sitting judges retiring in the next couple years, and having Eric Holder and John Kerry replace them? This could easily happen.

    Just imagine that, and please don't forget to vote for an electable non-Democrat for Senate if your state has one in contention. Pleeeezeee!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • sgtrock21sgtrock21 Posts: 1,933 Senior Member
    #11
    bisley wrote: »
    I did so hope to see him behind bars.
    Justice would finally be served but I'm not counting on it. There is a pending Freedom of Information Act request for the damning documents that I would bet the farm were destroyed less than a hour following those congressional bullies demands.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • HappySquidHappySquid Posts: 461 Member
    #12
    breamfisher wrote: »
    See....

    I'm not going to shed a tear over him going, but until we know who the replacement is, I'm cautious. Heck, who knows why he's leaving. Could be he's going somewhere he could have more "impact."


    Mehico???
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • sgtrock21sgtrock21 Posts: 1,933 Senior Member
    #13
    Biden/Holder 2016!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Make_My_DayMake_My_Day Posts: 7,927 Senior Member
    #14
    The commie holder is resigning, so Ovomit can appoint another commie that the senate Republicans can't defeat because of the new senate 51% majority rules.
    JOE MCCARTHY WAS RIGHT:
    THE DEMOCRATS ARE THE NEW COMMUNISTS!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • samzheresamzhere Posts: 10,923 Senior Member
    #15
    Make_My_Day wrote: »
    The commie holder is resigning, so Ovomit can appoint another commie that the senate Republicans can't defeat because of the new senate 51% majority rules.

    There are quite a few Democrats in the Senate (fairly conservative Demos) who would be reluctant to confirm a total leftwing nominee.

    But generally, if a nominee isn't scandalous or is not a crook, it's likely that person would be confirmed. That's just how it goes.

    Regardless, Holder will likely stay in office until after the elections, because the whole confirmation process would stir up lots of angst that the Demos know that might work against them in the November elections. So Holder will plan to stay on till maybe December.

    Doesn't really matter. The replacement of Holder may face genuine opposition if and only if the Demos lose control of the Senate in November.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • Make_My_DayMake_My_Day Posts: 7,927 Senior Member
    #16
    There's no reason I can think of that would prevent them from pushing through a new nominee after the election with a lame-duck congress. There is also speculation that if they can get a new A.G., Holder will be nominated for the Supreme Court to replace Ginsburg who may be retiring. Conservative Democrats? That seems to be a contradiction of reality, but that's just my opinion. To me they're all commie-leaning.
    JOE MCCARTHY WAS RIGHT:
    THE DEMOCRATS ARE THE NEW COMMUNISTS!
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • samzheresamzhere Posts: 10,923 Senior Member
    #17
    Like any political party, Democrats have a width of individual tenets. When I said "conservative" Demos I of course was speaking within the scope of the Democrat party, not "conservative" in the overall sense. These are generally from centrist states that elect Democrats or Republicans both, and so they are not wanting to anger the middle of the road voter.

    You're right about a lame duck Senate but public opinion can also be significant and it can make many prospective "rebels" to be cautious. Sometimes.

    Re. "conservative leaning" Demo Senators, I'm thinking people like Joe Manchin (WVA), Joe Donnelley (Ind) or Kay Hagan (NC). Not true conservatives of course, but within the Democrat scope, yeah.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • JermanatorJermanator Posts: 16,244 Senior Member
    #18
    breamfisher wrote: »
    See....

    I'm not going to shed a tear over him going, but until we know who the replacement is, I'm cautious.
    You can rest easy now. Al Sharpton is helping Obama find a new AG...
    http://www.businessinsider.com/al-sharpton-says-hes-helping-pick-the-next-attorney-general-2014-9
    Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.
    -Thomas Paine
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • snake284snake284 Posts: 22,429 Senior Member
    #19
    samzhere wrote: »
    Don't doubt for one second that his replacement will be any less of a zealot than Holder is.

    And, gang, this is why we MUST overturn the Democrat majority in the Senate in November: Can you imagine Eric Holder nominated and approved for the Supreme Court?

    Picture 2 sitting judges retiring in the next couple years, and having Eric Holder and John Kerry replace them? This could easily happen.

    Just imagine that, and please don't forget to vote for an electable non-Democrat for Senate if your state has one in contention. Pleeeezeee!

    Amen Sam, I hate Rinos as much as anybody, but I love them compared to Dummycraps.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • JasonMPDJasonMPD Posts: 6,583 Senior Member
    #20
    I'll rejoice only when he is getting three squares a day in a prison.
    “There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” – Will Rogers
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • coolgunguycoolgunguy Posts: 6,637 Senior Member
    #21
    :that:

    Allowing him to resign is too nice a send-off.
    "Bipartisan" usually means that a bigger than normal deception is happening.
    George Carlin
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • mohicanmohican Posts: 381 Member
    #22
    Ok, the court ruled against Holder and the DOJ two days before his resignation on Fast and Furious records....

    As for impeachment, a bare republican majority wouldn't matter - it takes a super majority.

    I think deeper motives = ie Obama will try a controversial appointment as a means to boost dem votes. Or prepare Holder for SCOTUS. or both.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • JasonMPDJasonMPD Posts: 6,583 Senior Member
    #23
    mohican wrote: »
    Ok, the court ruled against Holder and the DOJ two days before his resignation on Fast and Furious records....

    As for impeachment, a bare republican majority wouldn't matter - it takes a super majority.

    I think deeper motives = ie Obama will try a controversial appointment as a means to boost dem votes. Or prepare Holder for SCOTUS. or both.

    This country is so in the crapper. It basically has stage 5 government cancer.

    Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
    “There are three kinds of men. The one that learns by reading. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.” – Will Rogers
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
  • mohicanmohican Posts: 381 Member
    #24
    My opinion, FWIW: for the Federal system to survive with any personal freedom intact: Masses will have to divorce both the Democrat and Republican parties. There is no salvation in either. Build a supermajority of states that will hold an Article V convention to do things like
    1. Allow Secession
    2. Abolish the 17th amendment
    3. Abolish the 16th amendment
    4. Shooot - abolish every amendment from the 14th on except the one that ended prohibition

    That would be a good start.
    · Share on TwitterShare on Facebook
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

MORE YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Sign Me Up
Advertisement