Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
shush
Senior MemberPosts: 6,259 Senior Member
Sydney siege: Gun law debate begins in Australia.

''Cross bench senator David Leyonhjelm has called for Australians to be allowed to carry concealed weapons.''
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-30527662
''Mr Leyonhjelm, a Liberal Democratic Party senator for New South Wales, said the siege would have been lessened if some of the 17 hostages had been armed.''
"What happened in that cafe would have been most unlikely to have occurred in Florida, Texas, or Vermont, or Alaska in America, or perhaps even Switzerland as well," Senator Leyonhjelm told ABC Radio.
''Statistically speaking" in those jurisdictions, "one or two of the victims" would have had a concealed gun, he said.''
''Police inquiries have revealed that the Sydney cafe gunman, 50-year-old Man Haron Monis, was not a registered firearms licence holder and had never held a gun licence in New South Wales, the state where the siege took place.''
Shock... gasp.... horror. :yikes:
But former coalition deputy prime minister Tim Fischer said that the analogy with US gun laws was "seductive nonsense".
"Debate will always go on in a good democracy but where it is built on a pack of lies from the NRA [US National Rifle Association] it should be dealt with swiftly," he said.
"It is seductive nonsense to say concealed gun laws would somehow work here in Australia."
Seductive nonsense?
Do they not remember Canada?
If you ain't got it, you cannot use it.
PS.
Mind you, I am one to talk, say what.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-30527662
''Mr Leyonhjelm, a Liberal Democratic Party senator for New South Wales, said the siege would have been lessened if some of the 17 hostages had been armed.''
"What happened in that cafe would have been most unlikely to have occurred in Florida, Texas, or Vermont, or Alaska in America, or perhaps even Switzerland as well," Senator Leyonhjelm told ABC Radio.
''Statistically speaking" in those jurisdictions, "one or two of the victims" would have had a concealed gun, he said.''
''Police inquiries have revealed that the Sydney cafe gunman, 50-year-old Man Haron Monis, was not a registered firearms licence holder and had never held a gun licence in New South Wales, the state where the siege took place.''
Shock... gasp.... horror. :yikes:
But former coalition deputy prime minister Tim Fischer said that the analogy with US gun laws was "seductive nonsense".
"Debate will always go on in a good democracy but where it is built on a pack of lies from the NRA [US National Rifle Association] it should be dealt with swiftly," he said.
"It is seductive nonsense to say concealed gun laws would somehow work here in Australia."
Seductive nonsense?
Do they not remember Canada?
If you ain't got it, you cannot use it.
PS.
Mind you, I am one to talk, say what.

Replies
Jerry
As always Teach, you have us in one. :applause: :jester:
I have probably 'cussed' the NRA as much as anyone, anywhere, but only for their fundraising techniques. I still maintain membership because they have the facts that are there for anyone who is willing to examine them.
Someone should challenge Mr. Fischer on this, and see if he can refute them.
I have seen some interviews with prominent gun store owners in Sydney and Melbourne Australia. Aside from actually explaining what the different firearms classifications are and how citizens can go about obtaining different kinds of guns, they also explained that there has been quite a resurgence of talk within the pro gun communities. They explained that ever since 1996 and the almost outright ban on semi automatic firearms and pump action shotgun there has been a lot of political talk about restructuring the classifications to be far more reasonable.
I do not think their political climate will be amicable to talk about concealed weapons permits just yet. After all, getting a semi automatic handgun is virtually impossible for the average income citizen.
- George Orwell
Jerry
― Douglas Adams