Home› Main Category› General Firearms
breamfisher
Senior MemberLiving in a van, down by the river.Posts: 14,039 Senior Member
Remington 760

I know the 740/742/7400 are not well-thought of, but what of the 760? Does it have the same problems as its autoloading brethren?
I ask because we have, in storage, my Dad's old rifle: a 760 in .280 Remington. It hasn't been fired in years, and was thinking of running a few rounds through it, but would rather not if it means beating up my Dad's rifle. I'd rather just clean it and lube it occasionally than risk damaging it.
Note: this is an early model 760, NOT a 7600. I understand that the locking lugs are different on a 7600. Vintage on the rifle is 1957/58. When they caliber was first introduced.
I ask because we have, in storage, my Dad's old rifle: a 760 in .280 Remington. It hasn't been fired in years, and was thinking of running a few rounds through it, but would rather not if it means beating up my Dad's rifle. I'd rather just clean it and lube it occasionally than risk damaging it.
Note: this is an early model 760, NOT a 7600. I understand that the locking lugs are different on a 7600. Vintage on the rifle is 1957/58. When they caliber was first introduced.
I'm just here for snark.
Replies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remington_Model_760
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
― Douglas Adams
:agree: And it's a 7mm-06, a.k.a. the 7mm Remington Express, a.k.a. .280 Remington. That chambering suffered from its big brother, the 7mm Rem. Mag. taking the spotlight.
― Douglas Adams
AKA: Former Founding Member
My first hunting rifle was a 760 Gamemaster in 30-06. I inherited it after my uncle passed away, and used it for years to hunt everything from feral cats to deer. Love that gun, and will not sell it
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
This rifle is part of the reason I love the .280 Remington (though I've never killed game with it) and have a long-held love for carbines. Because... Dad.
Thanks for the info, gents. I'll feel better about getting this thing running. I figure I should avoid "light magnum" ammo in it due to, as Knitepoet pointed out, lack of camming action. And a note: this thing isn't "mine." I have a brother and we still haven't divvied up Dad's firearms although he's been dead for a piece. Mom's still alive, and we really haven't divided up much.
Jerry
You just have to accept the fact they're not MOA rifles, but it doesn't matter when you're shooting deer sized game at 200 or under. JMHO
Was there an issue mounting a scope on them.............I can't remember. I could never see the purpose back in the days of plentiful and cheap .22 ammo to get a pump.
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
I have two Speedmaster .22 rifles, one was my Dad's and one was mine. I don't know of any real issues with the pump version. As to issues common to BOTH of them, they don't function well with dirty innards, especially with buildup around the breech and on/in the bolt. Kept clean, they will shoot mixed .22 Short, Long, and Long Rifle without a hiccup.
Scope mounting wasn't a problem. 3/8 .22 mounts with one inch rings and a scope and you're in bidnezz. :tooth:
― Douglas Adams