Is Pantsuit on her way out....................

Big ChiefBig Chief Senior MemberPosts: 32,995 Senior Member
Too much stuff being let outta the bag on her, some may have been leaked by her enemies in DC and even the WH.

If so, I see Joe stepping in. Seems folks like her less the more she appears in public even though she has to come outta her bunker and face the voting public and her accusers in Congress.

Will Obammy throw her to the dogs, had enough of her trying to cover up her misdeeds and saying the WH knew all along and she is not to blame.....................


Hillary faces dangerous enemy in the Obama administration

http://nypost.com/2015/07/26/hillary-has-a-dangerous-enemy-in-the-obama-administration/
It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
«13

Replies

  • Fat BillyFat Billy Senior Member Posts: 1,813 Senior Member
    Couldn't happen to a better person. She's not as slippery as her husband Teflon Bill. :applause: Later,
    Fat Billy

    Recoil is how you know primer ignition is complete.
  • tubabucknuttubabucknut Banned Posts: 3,520 Senior Member
    Careful what you wish for. No one wanted the "pantsuit" in 08. We got Obama instead. Me personally, I would love for her to get the nom. That baggage bringing her down now, could be destructive if used by a candidate with a pair. You know unlike Romney. She is a great candidate to run against.
    It's because I hate Trump.
  • DoctorWhoDoctorWho Senior Member Posts: 9,496 Senior Member
    Hillary Clinton may as well be a robot, and given current technology, look at the really old stuff Disney has, it would not surprise me if most politicians are really some sort of bogus androids.

    If not totally under mind control, such small meager parrot like minds as they have.

    Think about it, a brainless, wittless realistic looking dummy with a simple audio interface, oh crap, we already have them, we call them POLITICIANS !!!!
    "There is some evil in all of us, Doctor, even you, the Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say, you do not improve with age. Founding member of the G&A forum since 1996
  • coolgunguycoolgunguy Senior Member Posts: 6,452 Senior Member
    Careful what you wish for. No one wanted the "pantsuit" in 08. We got Obama instead. Me personally, I would love for her to get the nom. That baggage bringing her down now, could be destructive if used by a candidate with a pair. You know unlike Romney. She is a great candidate to run against.


    Normally, I might agree with that statement. However, as we have illustrated here of late, there is a certain portion of the populace that will vote 'R' without thought, there is a certain amount that will vote 'D' without thought...and there is an exceedingly small percentage of folks who can be swayed. Many of those folks haven't made the decision who they WILL vote for yet, but some have decided who they WON'T vote for.

    I'm not saying that she would run a decent campaign or that she wouldn't get her butt handed to her in a proper debate...I'm just questioning whether enough would care.
    "Bipartisan" usually means that a bigger than normal deception is happening.
    George Carlin
  • DoctorWhoDoctorWho Senior Member Posts: 9,496 Senior Member
    General apathy has elected more people into office that the actual vote.
    "There is some evil in all of us, Doctor, even you, the Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say, you do not improve with age. Founding member of the G&A forum since 1996
  • tubabucknuttubabucknut Banned Posts: 3,520 Senior Member
    DoctorWho wrote: »
    General apathy has elected more people into office that the actual vote.
    This, or fear of the other guy causing one to vote for an individual he might not have over for dinner. They vote for someone they have notional respect for.
    It's because I hate Trump.
  • BigslugBigslug Senior Member Posts: 7,037 Senior Member
    This, or fear of the other guy causing one to vote for an individual he might not have over for dinner. They vote for someone they have notional respect for.

    What is so hard about grasping the concept of voting AGAINST the other guy??? They're ALL willing to enter into and play the game, therefore I pretty much virtually no respect for them by default. It's simply a matter of choosing the shaft with or without lube.

    As for Hillary, Leninists fawn mindlessly over the Clintons like conservatives genuflect for Reagan. We can hope that the stench from the skeletons in her closet will ultimately prove overpowering, but never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Senior Member Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    Biden or the Socialist (Sanders?) would be easier for a Rep to defeat in the general election, I think.

    The Dems have pinned all their hopes on the Pantsuit and her dropping out would would put them in turmoil and no other appeals to them as much as she does.
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • tubabucknuttubabucknut Banned Posts: 3,520 Senior Member
    Bigslug wrote: »
    What is so hard about grasping the concept of voting AGAINST the other guy???
    You are voting for the President of the United States. The potus represents the executive branch, and is the commander in chief of the most powerful military in the world. The potus wields incredible amounts of power and authority. If you can not vote for the individual, then you act recklessly by putting an unqualified waste in that position. What is so hard to understand about that????

    I choose not to vote for a shafting, lubed or not. If you choose the shaft, then by all means grab your ankles. I may be shafted when it's all said and done, but I will not have turned around, dropped trow of my own accord, and bent over during the process. Go to your happy place.
    It's because I hate Trump.
  • NNNN Senior Member Posts: 23,966 Senior Member
    coolgunguy wrote: »
    Normally, I might agree with that statement. However, as we have illustrated here of late, there is a certain portion of the populace that will vote 'R' without thought, there is a certain amount that will vote 'D' without thought...and there is an exceedingly small percentage of folks who can be swayed. Many of those folks haven't made the decision who they WILL vote for yet, but some have decided who they WON'T vote for. .
    That is so and now there are 15% of "R" voters that want Trump to run as a third party candidate which means at this point there would be at least 15% of "R" voters
    trying to make a statement and that will/could get a "D" elected.
    A Veteran is someone that served in the Military, it does not matter where they served.
  • BufordBuford Senior Member Posts: 6,660 Senior Member
    I wouldn't count her out yet. I never thought dumbass would get elected but he did.
    Just look at the flowers Lizzie, just look at the flowers.
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Senior Member Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • JayhawkerJayhawker Moderator Posts: 15,049 Senior Member
    Buford wrote: »
    I wouldn't count her out yet. I never thought dumbass would get elected but he did.

    Really? I knew that the current occupant of the White House was a winner the moment I saw him....sure hoped it wouldn't be the case...but my lizard brain was telling me he was a shoo in from the word go....
    Sharps Model 1874 - "The rifle that made the west safe for Winchester"
  • horselipshorselips Senior Member Posts: 3,626 Senior Member
    As I have said, Hillary could be caught naked in bed with Bill Cosby, Caitlyn Jenner, whips, chains, three ten year olds, and an Irish Setter, and she'd still get the Democratic Party nomination. Scandals are badges of courage to every liberal, and the worse it is the better they like it. To every single Democrat, the ultimate qualifier for office is narcissistic arrogance in the face of deserved disgrace. (See Isaiah 5:20).
  • alphasigmookiealphasigmookie Senior Member Posts: 8,737 Senior Member
    cpj wrote: »
    Me too.

    What I'm curious about is, why are there no other Dems in the running? Odd that they are putting all their eggs in one basket.

    There are a few, but other than Bernie, they're mostly just there in case Clinton does something really stupid because the party and the media have pretty much decided already that "it's her turn". I'd say my liberal friends are fairly split on their feelings about hillary. There are some who mainly just are excited for a woman to win and the rest want Bernie, or for Elizabeth Warren to run.
    "Finding out that you have run out of toilet paper is a good example of lack of preparation, buying 10 years worth is silly"
    -DoctorWho
  • snake284snake284 Senior Member Posts: 21,851 Senior Member
    Als
    Big Chief wrote: »
    Biden or the Socialist (Sanders?) would be easier for a Rep to defeat in the general election, I think.

    The Dems have pinned all their hopes on the Pantsuit and her dropping out would would put them in turmoil and no other appeals to them as much as she does.

    :that:

    You're right on chief. And what BigSlug said about nothing wrong with voting AGAINST Someone. I really don't like to think what I may end up having to do as voting for the lesser of evils, as much as I feel it's voting AGAINST the Communists.

    Also, our choices are what they are. If you don't vote AGANST someone you will get your worst nightmare, Hillary. She won't be an improvement over Obummer.

    We can only hope that her indiscretions take her down. I don't think anyone else in the Libtard ranks has her political clout. I think about anybody on the list of Repub candidates would have no problem beating Sanders or Biden or Warren. But I believe it will take all of us together voting for the Republican Nominee to keep the dummycrats out of the White House in 2016.

    Nowadays we have to do what we have to do. The problem as I see it is the Conservatives have to hold our nose and vote for whoever can beat the Dems. The reason for this is not something you will cure by teaching someone a lesson, or that we can overcome in a couple years. The problem is we're up against an electorate that has been indoctrinated all their lives in the public school system and by the main stream media. Most of our younger people have had their minds poisoned. What we need to do, is try to get the Republican in office and then put pressure on them to reform the education system and keep the wolves off the conservative media, that being not only Fox News, but also radio talk shows that Obama and the left have targeted with their totally unfair Fairness act. Maybe we can turn this trend around and get people back on track instead of being mindless non thinking Zombies.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
  • tubabucknuttubabucknut Banned Posts: 3,520 Senior Member
    I'd say my liberal friends are fairly split on their feelings about hillary. There are some who mainly just are excited for a woman to win and the rest want Bernie, or for Elizabeth Warren to run.
    Well it is official. The Libs are as colossally stupid as the Repubs, when it comes to choosing Presidential candidates. Lose, lose it is.
    It's because I hate Trump.
  • snake284snake284 Senior Member Posts: 21,851 Senior Member
    Well it is official. The Libs are as colossally stupid as the Repubs, when it comes to choosing Presidential candidates. Lose, lose it is.

    The Libs aren't so stupid, at least they back their candidates to the hilt. You can bet whoever they nominate they will vote for, unlike nit picky Repubs who refuse to vote for the Nominee if he/she doesn't say and do exactly as they say. Sam said it best on here, "Do your protesting during the primary, then vote for the party nominee in the general election, and you'll be surprised how we will rule them. And while you're at it vote as conservative as you can in the primary and try to put a good candidate up for nomination. Please, anything is better than any Democrat.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
  • shushshush Senior Member Posts: 6,259 Senior Member
    Well it is official. The Libs are as colossally stupid as the Repubs, when it comes to choosing Presidential candidates. Lose, lose it is.

    Poll: Clinton's honesty and trustworthy problem extends to swing states.

    Updated 2347 GMT (0647 HKT) June 17, 2015
    http://edition.cnn.com/2015/06/17/politics/poll-2016-elections-hillary-clinton-trustworthy/


    "Peter A. Brown, assistant director of the poll, said that Clinton is experiencing a "continuing slide" with how she is "perceived by voters who continue to say she is not honest and trustworthy."

    cjp wrote: »..... Oh dear God, I've admitted to liking something Limey.I'll never hear the end of this.

    Jayhawker wrote: »...But seriously Shush....

    Big Chief wrote: ».........walking around with a greasy butt ain't no fun, though!

     


     

  • Dr. dbDr. db Senior Member Posts: 1,541 Senior Member
    Now the only question is do they think being honest and trustworthy is a requirement for president?
  • coolgunguycoolgunguy Senior Member Posts: 6,452 Senior Member
    Dr. db wrote: »
    Now the only question is do they think being honest and trustworthy is a requirement for president?

    Nope. Just have to have an "R" or a "D" on their campaign material. All the rest counts for "not as bad as ________" fodder.
    "Bipartisan" usually means that a bigger than normal deception is happening.
    George Carlin
  • LanceLance Member Posts: 149 Member
    coolgunguy wrote: »
    Normally, I might agree with that statement. However, as we have illustrated here of late, there is a certain portion of the populace that will vote 'R' without thought, there is a certain amount that will vote 'D' without thought...and there is an exceedingly small percentage of folks who can be swayed. Many of those folks haven't made the decision who they WILL vote for yet, but some have decided who they WON'T vote for.

    I'm not saying that she would run a decent campaign or that she wouldn't get her butt handed to her in a proper debate...I'm just questioning whether enough would care.

    People who declare themselves "independent" are at an all time high:
  • LanceLance Member Posts: 149 Member
    NN wrote: »
    That is so and now there are 15% of "R" voters that want Trump to run as a third party candidate which means at this point there would be at least 15% of "R" voters
    trying to make a statement and that will/could get a "D" elected.

    What makes you think that Hillary has a lock amongst D's? They haven't forgotten Obama's BS.

    She was a terrible candidate in '08, and she's a terrible candidate now, and that's why Sanders is even in the discussion.
  • tennmiketennmike Senior Member Posts: 26,099 Senior Member
    If Pantsuit gets fouled out with several DOJ investigations and possible indictments, then the Dems can push Joe "Double barrel shotgun" Biden, Bernie "90% business tax" Sanders, and Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren.

    And then there's the Cecil B. DeMille 'cast of thousands' on the Repub side.

    Clowns to the left of me,
    Jokers to the right,
    Here I am stuck in the middle with you.
    If the U.S. Congress was put in charge of the Sahara Desert, there would be a shortage of sand in under six months.



  • DoctorWhoDoctorWho Senior Member Posts: 9,496 Senior Member
    MantySuit ! LoL !!
    "There is some evil in all of us, Doctor, even you, the Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say, you do not improve with age. Founding member of the G&A forum since 1996
  • samzheresamzhere Banned Posts: 10,923 Senior Member
    Lance wrote: »
    People who declare themselves "independent" are at an all time high:

    I had an all time high in the 60s but then I stopped smoking weed.

    Outside of a dog, a book is a man’s best friend. Inside of a dog, it’s too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
  • DoctorWhoDoctorWho Senior Member Posts: 9,496 Senior Member
    samzhere wrote: »
    I had an all time high in the 60s but then I stopped smoking weed.

    You probably would have had better results smoking marijuana..... Lol.
    "There is some evil in all of us, Doctor, even you, the Valeyard is an amalgamation of the darker sides of your nature, somewhere between your twelfth and final incarnation, and I may say, you do not improve with age. Founding member of the G&A forum since 1996
  • JermanatorJermanator Senior Member Posts: 15,197 Senior Member
  • coolgunguycoolgunguy Senior Member Posts: 6,452 Senior Member
    Jermanator wrote: »


    Surely, you must be joking.
    "Bipartisan" usually means that a bigger than normal deception is happening.
    George Carlin
  • coolgunguycoolgunguy Senior Member Posts: 6,452 Senior Member
    Lance wrote: »
    People who declare themselves "independent" are at an all time high:


    People claim lots of things. Nobody wants to admit to voting blindly..."I thought long and hard before pulling the 'straight ticket lever!" When/where the rubber meets the road, I think many (maybe most) of those will revert to type. Human nature.
    "Bipartisan" usually means that a bigger than normal deception is happening.
    George Carlin
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.