It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
NN wrote: »
I tried that in '69
tennmike wrote: »
In your OP, you set up a survival situation. Which would you rather have, a woman that could help carry the load, or one that would expect to be waited on hand and foot, and contribute NOTHING to the effort to survive? I plainly stated that a country girl that knew how to do stuff was superior to your choices. By the time you'd carried those two heifers on a chip all day, tended the garden, hunted for food, dressed the game, cooked all the meals, and washed up what passed for dishes, you'd be too tired for a romp in the hay. And that would get old REAL fast. Not like you can go to a restaurant every time you get a case of the hollow belly.
At least a good hunting dog could help find game. And track wounded game.
Anyway, Raquel or Pamela would probably end up wiping their junk with poison oak or poison ivy leaves, and you'd have to listen to that mess for days. Your choice of wimmins for a survival situation speaks volumes of your lack of critical thinking going into a survival situation. There's a reason those women get passed along a lot; the guys got tired of their whining and crap. :rotflmao:
ghostsniper1 wrote: »
I'd rather just sex myself to death with the woman from the sixties (her in that era) than to even survive a week. A man has to have his priorities ya know... Lol
Jayhawker wrote: »
She won't be in the mood....
Temporary Price Reduction
Give a Gift
PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE
Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.