Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
shush
Posts: 6,259 Senior Member
"I'm not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy in general."
shush
Posts: 6,259 Senior Member
It would appear that our Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP , very new Leader of the Opposition(TheLabour Party) is reinforcing, in a very big way, my first impression.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34840708
1 hour ago.
"Labour MPs have criticised their leader Jeremy Corbyn after he said he was "not happy" with a police policy of "shoot-to-kill" during a terror attack.
Mr Corbyn said any such policy could be "dangerous" and "counter-productive".
Shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn told the BBC he backed existing Labour policy on shoot-to-kill to save lives, adding: "I can't answer for Jeremy."
He said the UK policy was that any use of "lethal force" had to be reasonable, proportionate and designed to protect human life.
Mr Benn's comments came after the stormy meeting of Labour MPs on Monday evening - BBC political correspondent Eleanor Garnier said one Labour MP "savaged" Mr Corbyn during the meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party, while others said he was "aggressively heckled".
Labour MP John Mann asked Mr Corbyn if he was saying "terrorists with Kalashnikovs should not be shot by security forces in such situations".
The row comes after Mr Corbyn told the BBC on Monday that a "war on the streets" must be avoided and also that UK air strikes in Syria could make the situation there "far worse".
"I'm not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive. I think you have to have security that prevents people firing off weapons where you can."
The Labour leader was speaking after 129 people were killed in a series of terror attacks in Paris on Friday"
And you think you have problems?
I may retreat to my cellar(one of which I do not possess)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34840708
1 hour ago.
"Labour MPs have criticised their leader Jeremy Corbyn after he said he was "not happy" with a police policy of "shoot-to-kill" during a terror attack.
Mr Corbyn said any such policy could be "dangerous" and "counter-productive".
Shadow foreign secretary Hilary Benn told the BBC he backed existing Labour policy on shoot-to-kill to save lives, adding: "I can't answer for Jeremy."
He said the UK policy was that any use of "lethal force" had to be reasonable, proportionate and designed to protect human life.
Mr Benn's comments came after the stormy meeting of Labour MPs on Monday evening - BBC political correspondent Eleanor Garnier said one Labour MP "savaged" Mr Corbyn during the meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party, while others said he was "aggressively heckled".
Labour MP John Mann asked Mr Corbyn if he was saying "terrorists with Kalashnikovs should not be shot by security forces in such situations".
The row comes after Mr Corbyn told the BBC on Monday that a "war on the streets" must be avoided and also that UK air strikes in Syria could make the situation there "far worse".
"I'm not happy with the shoot-to-kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive. I think you have to have security that prevents people firing off weapons where you can."
The Labour leader was speaking after 129 people were killed in a series of terror attacks in Paris on Friday"
And you think you have problems?
I may retreat to my cellar(one of which I do not possess)
Replies
Also remember that such kind of statements are usually sustained by someone that might never have tried to stop someone from even slapping him, much less even grabbing a real firearm and witness first-hand its potential and terminal effects over tissue and material, so that might also explain the grossly naive (To say the least) opinions he's expressing.
He is being "called" on a great many of the statements he makes.
By his own Shadow Cabinet and sitting Labour Party MPs in general.
I fear his Brutus moment is not too far in the future.
People like Mr. Corbyn will create a war in the streets. His is of the opinion of many who don't have to live where the trouble brews, those who live in their castles well guarded and out of danger who submit the masses to a life of danger by preventing them the luxury of self defense. He's the same thing as our Libtards. He's a UK Obama. He talks to the masses who have no clue but have the votes to keep idiots like him in office.
Shush, remember that you guys are Not alone in this. And we need to stick together.
Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
Now there is merit in some cases for taking one or two alive and that would be to get information. But that would be at a point where the GFer is no longer danger to the LEO or public.
- George Orwell
Oh! you cannot call him that. :yikes:
He is the leader of THE Working Man's party.
Although I cannot for the life of me see what piece of mans work he worked at,
apart from that of a full-time National Union official and a local Councillor.
A cub reporter for the local rag maybe?
He holds no governmental office, as such.
He is the Leader of the Opposition.
Outside of being the Labour leader, he is just a Member of Parliament.
The lads who do the dirty are of the same mind. :up:
The politicians got "Shoot-to-kill" off the telly I think.
― Douglas Adams
Jerry
Good one Teach!!!!!!! Now we all know that the answer to your question is,,wait..........wait.......A cell phone with 911 speed dail!! Any Obama dummy rat would.. Me personally would choose the 1911. PS I have been to St. Louis several times but not East St. Louis. Just some places I stay out of..