Home Main Category Clubhouse

Hey, Navy what is this?

Farm Boy DeuceFarm Boy Deuce Posts: 6,083 Senior Member
Did any of you other Navy guys see that USN has done away with Rates? That is about enough to piss me off. 200 years and now the thinks the Army has the right idea. Dumbasses.

https://www.navytimes.com/articles/the-end-of-ratings-whats-next-in-the-navys-radical-enlisted-shake-up
I am afraid we forget sometime that the basic and simple things brings us the most pleasure.
Dad 5-31-13
«1

Replies

  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Posts: 8,305 Senior Member
    Dont worry, its the Nav, they will still find a way to make the simple silly.
    It's boring, and your lack of creativity knows no bounds.
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    Just more of these social experiments/agenda pushing PC/ LGBT/ Gender Neutral/ Fruitcake idys down the throats of our military.
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • Big Al1Big Al1 Posts: 8,818 Senior Member
    The rating our fearless leaders are looking for is "Mindless Drone!!"
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,288 Senior Member
    I don't understand everything I read in that article, but it sounds like a Charlie Foxtrot of the first order.
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    zorba wrote: »
    I don't understand everything I read in that article, but it sounds like a Charlie Foxtrot of the first order.

    Hey, Sailors used to go ashore and watch belly dancers in exotic lands...................heck they may allow them to serve abroad ships now without a rating...........

    Won't need Marines in grass skirts aboard ship anymo:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,288 Senior Member
    Big Chief wrote: »
    Won't need Marines in grass skirts anymo:rotflmao: :rotflmao:
    Ya mean Ned's out of a job?!? :yikes:
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • woodsrunnerwoodsrunner Posts: 2,725 Senior Member
    26 years associated with the Navy. E-1 to E-5, then "over the bows" and O-1 to O-5 and retired. Excuse me while I go back to the fantail and PUKE!
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    This is the result when you have a mentally deficient morally bankrupt brain cell deficient crap hole window licker Democrat hack in the SecNav position. Gonna be fun trying to figure out who does what aboard ship. Gonna be a whole lot of 'that ain't my job, Chief' stuff when you're trying to get something done. You sure you want to mistakenly put a former GMG on the radar or a EM on the boiler watch??!! :roll2: Gonna be a cluster fornication of highest order. Running these social engineering experiments on the military is going to make a mess that will take YEARS to clean up.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,772 Senior Member
    The way I read the article it is the Navy will still have their specialty positions and jobs, but instead of calling a yeoman first class YN1 he/she will be called PO1
    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
  • snake284snake284 Posts: 22,429 Senior Member
    Nobummer is all about killing tradition. You want to kill a country, kill its traditions. And it's all done in the name of progress. That's why Obummer is a progressive.

    I hope Hitlery chimes in on this. She deserves some of the credit.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    Diver43 wrote: »
    The way I read the article it is the Navy will still have their specialty positions and jobs, but instead of calling a yeoman first class YN1 he/she will be called PO1

    Over the 1MC on a carrier somewhere at sea, "PO3 Smith report to the bridge immediately!" 20+ PO3 Smiths show up on the bridge. See the fornicating problem? :roll2:
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Posts: 8,305 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    Over the 1MC on a carrier somewhere at sea, "PO3 Smith report to the bridge immediately!" 20+ PO3 Smiths show up on the bridge. See the fornicating problem? :roll2:

    Well if the Smiths have a fornicating problem, then a ship is a good place for all 20.
    It's boring, and your lack of creativity knows no bounds.
  • NNNN Posts: 25,236 Senior Member
    Heck
    they want to join the Marines.

    :iwo:
  • NNNN Posts: 25,236 Senior Member
    zorba wrote: »
    Ya mean Ned's out of a job?!? :yikes:
    Watch it, Klinger!
  • Big ChiefBig Chief Posts: 32,995 Senior Member
    NN wrote: »
    Watch it, Klinger!

    Ned you are insufferable toward Zorba...............in a friendly way.



    :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :spittingcoffee:
    It's only true if it's on this forum where opinions are facts and facts are opinions
    Words of wisdom from Big Chief: Flush twice, it's a long way to the Mess Hall
    I'd rather have my sister work in a whorehouse than own another Taurus!
  • NNNN Posts: 25,236 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    Over the 1MC on a carrier somewhere at sea, "PO3 Smith report to the bridge immediately!" 20+ PO3 Smiths show up on the bridge. See the problem? :roll2:
    NO
    now you have a working party
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    NN wrote: »
    NO
    now you have a working party

    On a carrier the working party would be Marines! Army got their mules, and the Navy got the Marines! :rotflmao:
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,288 Senior Member
    Big Chief wrote: »
    Ned you are insufferable toward Zorba...............in a friendly way.



    :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :spittingcoffee:

    Ned's one of the good ones. I figured he'd have an "appropriate" comeback! :roll2:
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,288 Senior Member
    NN wrote: »
    Watch it, Klinger!

    I probably would - might be interesting to see a Marine in a grass skirt! Itchy things though, by all accounts.
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • Farm Boy DeuceFarm Boy Deuce Posts: 6,083 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    On a carrier the working party would be Marines! Army got their mules, and the Navy got the Marines! :rotflmao:

    Not usually Marines on a carrier anymore, probably since tactical nukes went out of style. The only time I saw any embarked Marines was the times a Marine squadron was doing their flight deck quals.
    I am afraid we forget sometime that the basic and simple things brings us the most pleasure.
    Dad 5-31-13
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    Not usually Marines on a carrier anymore, probably since tactical nukes went out of style. The only time I saw any embarked Marines was the times a Marine squadron was doing their flight deck quals.

    :uhm: Navy must have gone downhill since I got out. Another tradition that quietly bit the dust. Back then, anything heavy cruiser and above had some Marines on it. Us DD, DDG, DEG, and DLG didn't have room for them nor need them. And our language and general demeanor were seen as detrimental to the corps; where ya think the Marines learned how to cuss! :roll2:
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • NNNN Posts: 25,236 Senior Member
    Not usually Marines on a carrier anymore, probably since tactical nukes went out of style. The only time I saw any embarked Marines was the times a Marine squadron was doing their flight deck quals.
    You were part of the new Navy, we [the old Corps] had 4 plane Dets from my Squadron since the end of the Vietnam war on carriers. The end of the EA-6A & EA-6B era and the gulf War ended that requirement.
  • Farm Boy DeuceFarm Boy Deuce Posts: 6,083 Senior Member
    We had EA-6s, they just demoted Navy pilots to fly them.
    I am afraid we forget sometime that the basic and simple things brings us the most pleasure.
    Dad 5-31-13
  • Farm Boy DeuceFarm Boy Deuce Posts: 6,083 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    :uhm: Navy must have gone downhill since I got out. Another tradition that quietly bit the dust. Back then, anything heavy cruiser and above had some Marines on it. Us DD, DDG, DEG, and DLG didn't have room for them nor need them. And our language and general demeanor were seen as detrimental to the corps; where ya think the Marines learned how to cuss! :roll2:

    We had other serious dudes with their own Conex boxes in one hangar bay, they kind of kept to themselves.
    I am afraid we forget sometime that the basic and simple things brings us the most pleasure.
    Dad 5-31-13
  • SargeSarge Posts: 324 Member
    So now instead of calling the Marines the court jesters, we're only allowed to call them Marines?? No matter, means the same... ;)
    Pain is okay. Puking is okay. Fear is okay. Falling is okay. Crawling is okay. Failure is okay. Quitting is not.
  • JermanatorJermanator Posts: 16,244 Senior Member
    zorba wrote: »
    I don't understand everything I read in that article.
    I hope I misread this part...
    We just didn’t have any good substitutes for seaman
    Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it.
    -Thomas Paine
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Posts: 8,305 Senior Member
    Jermanator wrote: »
    I hope I misread this part...
    That statement happened right after the Navy let women on ships........
    It's boring, and your lack of creativity knows no bounds.
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    That statement happened right after the Navy let women on ships........

    When they opened up the ratings to women after Vietnam they fast tracked them with all kinds of bonus points and rapid advancement. That's why it took me two shots to get to E-4 and I was looking at 10 more years to get to E-5 because the wimmins were given special treatment and NO SEA DUTY. Best reason ever to get out, and I wasn't alone in that. The unintended consequences of that decision by the Navy put them between a rock and a hard place regarding several ratings short of people because no one would stay in and put up with the lack of advancement opportunity.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement