Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
Would the witness please raise its right paw and repeat. . . .
In today's world of the perpetual encroachment of our constitutional rights, it now seems that K9's are somehow "deputized" and upon their "hit" on a vehicle, the occupants must then submit to a search of personal property and effects based upon what is now considered "probable cause" to conduct a search without warrant. Makes me wonder if the K9's in question took an Oath to become police officers or if the K9's can answer questions in a court of law - or, if their "testimony" (woof - woof) is valid as evidence. I would argue that K9's could "hit" a billfold of money that, unbeknownst to the now accused occupant, was previously used as drug money in prior transactions. I have much respect for these dogs and their handlers in SAR or finding possible IED's in a battlefield but here in the USA against citizens . . .? What say you?
This discussion has been closed.