Home Main Category Second Amendment/Politics

Domestic Terrorists

NomadacNomadac Posts: 902 Senior Member
Domestic Terrorists-
These Black Bloc Anarchists Don't Care What You Think of Them.
"We talked to nine Portland activists who think violence is necessary to fight fascism."
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/59zzk8/these-anarchists-dont-think-youre-doing-enough-to-fight-fascism

Antifa: Left-wing militants on the rise Antifa (short for anti-fascist or Anti-Fascist action)
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-40930831

Antifa Issues Horrifying Demand To U.S. Citizens
https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/antifa-issues-horrifying-demand/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=morning&utm_campaign=20170821-1

The list of Radical Groups goes on and on.

Replies

  • 303tom303tom Posts: 43 Member
    There are those in Government who refer to US in the NRA as Domestic Terrorists !...............
  • NomadacNomadac Posts: 902 Senior Member
    303tom wrote: »
    There are those in Government who refer to US in the NRA as Domestic Terrorists !...............
    You are referring to the Democrats that want to pass Gun Legislation.
  • NCFUBARNCFUBAR Posts: 4,324 Senior Member
    Right now I don't worry to much but the wave is gathering momentum. It will be interesting to see the actions of these idiots in the interim elections and in 2020. I have a feeling in many areas they will be way worse than the Black Panthers were back when Jug Ears was on the ticket. I can see them out front of polling facilitates thumping their chests and such in the more liberal urban areas especially trying to keep the Deplorables II from making it to the polls. While they are nowhere near ISIS they will attack physically in addition to mental and verbal if they get the mob mentality rolling.
    “The further a society drifts from truth ... the more it will hate those who speak it."
    - George Orwell
  • NCFUBARNCFUBAR Posts: 4,324 Senior Member
    He was know to authorities since another escapade back in 2013 when the raided his parents house looking for stuff to make some form of gas weapon. This sucker has a Chemistry Degree and now a second act ... if the powers that be do not call this domestic terrorism than I don't know what they need to see.
    “The further a society drifts from truth ... the more it will hate those who speak it."
    - George Orwell
  • Make_My_DayMake_My_Day Posts: 7,927 Senior Member
    NCFUBAR wrote: »
    Right now I don't worry to much but the wave is gathering momentum. It will be interesting to see the actions of these idiots in the interim elections and in 2020. I have a feeling in many areas they will be way worse than the Black Panthers were back when Jug Ears was on the ticket. I can see them out front of polling facilitates thumping their chests and such in the more liberal urban areas especially trying to keep the Deplorables II from making it to the polls. While they are nowhere near ISIS they will attack physically in addition to mental and verbal if they get the mob mentality rolling.

    Back in the 60's and 70's the Black Panthers were murdering cops, robbing armored cars and doing other despicable crimes. I don't see much difference between the old BP and the new BP.
    JOE MCCARTHY WAS RIGHT:
    THE DEMOCRATS ARE THE NEW COMMUNISTS!
  • john9001john9001 Posts: 668 Senior Member
    The congressional black caucus is talking about peaching Trump, no comment from the congressional white caucus yet.
  • Jack BurtonJack Burton Posts: 396 Member
    A study of the latest Hamburg G20 riots was quite educational. The German police all but got it handed to them. Antifa had a pretty sophisticated communications network, some say many in the media were in on it.
    Came for the fishing, stayed for the guns.
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    Wambli Ska wrote: »
    A man in Houston just got arrested for attempting to plant explosives to destroy a Confederate statue...

    They should be really careful in Texas, as Texas law allows for private citizens to not only protect their persons or family, their private property, or other citizens lives or property, but also public property with deadly force, if required. That learning curve might be a little steep down in Texas.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • horselipshorselips Posts: 3,628 Senior Member
    I'm counting on Antifa to finally go too far, and bring the wrath of the FBI down upon it - to be hunted and persecuted as the rest of organized crime has been since Prohibition.
  • TeachTeach Posts: 18,428 Senior Member
    "Domestic Terrorists"- - - - -those are the folks who vacuum your carpets, wash your windows, and do your laundry, and then go around blowing up stuff on their off-duty time, right?
    :uhm:
    Jerry
  • TeachTeach Posts: 18,428 Senior Member
    horselips wrote: »
    I'm counting on Antifa to finally go too far, and bring the wrath of the FBI down upon it - to be hunted and persecuted as the rest of organized crime has been since Prohibition.

    That might be a good possibility now that their good buddy Obama and his puppets Loretta Lynch and James Comey aren't running the show!
    Jerry
  • NCFUBARNCFUBAR Posts: 4,324 Senior Member
    I could see uncover work being a possibility ... just thinking out loud.
    “The further a society drifts from truth ... the more it will hate those who speak it."
    - George Orwell
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    NCFUBAR wrote: »
    I could see uncover work being a possibility ... just thinking out loud.

    I'd be willing to bet some serious folding money that the Feds AND State governments where ANTIFA is active have already got snitches embedded like ticks on a dogs back in that group. And some of the others, too, as far as that goes. The Alt-Right is kind of like the 1980s and 1990s skinheads and the Feds embedded snitches with them. If you remember back that far, the Feds, including the ATF tried to get Randy Weaver to infiltrate a neo-Nazi group to make that short barreled shotgun charge go away. Weaver didn't bite, though, and it ended badly for him.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • TeachTeach Posts: 18,428 Senior Member
    The alphabet soup government agencies terrorize law-abiding citizens, so they should have a really good understanding of the groups they choose to infiltrate, already. The scumbags just aren't as well financed, and they don't operate under the cover of "law".
    Jerry
  • tennmiketennmike Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    Here's a link to that Texas law. It's pretty specific and allows the use of force necessary to stop whatever is going on. That should be a major wake up call for the fools that want to do stupid stuff down there regarding the statues.

    Here's Texas Penal Code Chapter 9.41 and 9.42:

    http://codes.findlaw.com/tx/penal-code/penal-sect-9-41.html
    Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 9.41. Protection of One's Own Property
    a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other's trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property.

    (b) A person unlawfully dispossessed of land or tangible, movable property by another is justified in using force against the other when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to reenter the land or recover the property if the actor uses the force immediately or in fresh pursuit after the dispossession and:

    (1) the actor reasonably believes the other had no claim of right when he dispossessed the actor;  or

    (2) the other accomplished the dispossession by using force, threat, or fraud against the actor.

    Section 9.42
    http://codes.findlaw.com/tx/penal-code/penal-sect-9-42.html
    Texas Penal Code - PENAL § 9.42. Deadly Force to Protect Property

    A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:

    (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41;  and

    (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:

    (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime;  or

    (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property;  and

    (3) he reasonably believes that:

    (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means;  or

    (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.


    I like how Texas thinks about stuff like this. Easy to read and understand laws, too; another reason to like their laws.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement