Home› Main Category› Personal Defense
Zee
Posts: 28,444 Senior Member
Remington 870 Tac-14 Modifications

Some might remember I got a Remington Tac-14 awhile back.
It has been through several mod variations since then. For one reason or another, I didn’t like any of them. Until now.


Took it to the range today to sight in the Aimpoint and test the recoil with 2-3/4” Reduced Recoil 00 Buck. Checking the pattern as well.

Head is the result of a 10 yard shot pattern.
Chest is from a 20 yard shot pattern.
Recoil was very mild and while buckshot is not a long range endeavor and generally not my favoritte load, this set up should suffice for HD.
I will be testing the recoil of slugs next, with the arm brace. Determine if they are a viable option (and the reason for the Aimpoint) and check zero.
It has been through several mod variations since then. For one reason or another, I didn’t like any of them. Until now.


Took it to the range today to sight in the Aimpoint and test the recoil with 2-3/4” Reduced Recoil 00 Buck. Checking the pattern as well.

Head is the result of a 10 yard shot pattern.
Chest is from a 20 yard shot pattern.
Recoil was very mild and while buckshot is not a long range endeavor and generally not my favoritte load, this set up should suffice for HD.
I will be testing the recoil of slugs next, with the arm brace. Determine if they are a viable option (and the reason for the Aimpoint) and check zero.
"To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
Replies
So there is past presidence.
Folks probably think my little gun is stupid or weird. No worries.
Don’t remember your shotgun. Got pics to refresh my memory?
👍🏻
A shotgun is easier on the ears as well.
But, an AR has considerably less recoil. Decidedly more precision. While being much easier to manipulate.
Think of it this way, my shotguns are the howitzer for the living room to the front door.
My ARs are for hunting and moving.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
"The Un-Tactical"
"The Un-Tactical"
"The Un-Tactical"
2-3/4” Reduced Recoil Slug (x2)
2-3/4” Reduced Recoil 00 Buck (x1)
5yrds = Waist
10yrds = Head
20ytds = Chest
Slug recoil was considerably more than the Buck. Tolerable, though. It ain’t a Range gun.
"The Un-Tactical"
I do know of a shoot keeper who carries his Ithaca 37 Deerslayer Police Special on a quad for when he needs to slamfire 8 x 2& 3/4 birdshot at his "fecking ferals".
If the anticipated distance was +/- 10 yards to the front door.........
Given to same effectual zero at that distance but a disparity in recoil.....
Which load would you use?
Slug or Buck?
"The Un-Tactical"
Sorry for the lack of clarification
"The Un-Tactical"
I have seen soft armor stop buck and slug but, the slug was still fatal.
Buck penetration sucks! Slugs win in that area.
Buck, while effective up close on soft targets, loses its effectiveness quickly as distance increases.
Slugs are effective from point blank to wherever their accuracy renders them unsafe to engage.
So, the only advantage I see to the Buck is lower recoil and faster recovery shot to shot.
"The Un-Tactical"