Glass magnification preference?

This is a topic for which there is no right answer or wrong answer. It's simply to get opinions about your preference for scope magnification on hunting rifles.
I'm a proponent of less is better. Given the choice between 4x12 and 3x9, I'll take 3x9 for most conditions. I realize that there may be some specialized conditions for which the extra magnification might be useful, but I try to limit my shots at big game to 300 yards, preferably less, and find that 9x is all I need.
The flip side is if I happen to be hunting in heavy cover. For that, the lower magnification is definitely better. I would prefer even something less than 3x if possible. The one rifle I had made primarily for elk hunting sports a 2x8, as I know from personal experience that elk are where you find them. I've bumped them at spitting distances, and killed them at distances from 75 yards to approximately 300.
I will all concede that there are some specialized applications, such as prairie dog shooting, for which something along the lines of 6x18 with adjustable target turrets makes sense. I have one of those, chambered in .204 Ruger, but it also has a heavy 28 inch barrel. It's not exactly an all purpose rig.
Opinions, please.
Gun control laws make about as much sense as taking ex-lax to cure a cough.
Replies
Those scopes change POI between the low and high magnification settings. I'm a mediocre rifleman. I carry them at the lowest setting. Ive never shot an animal further than 75 yards.
Based on my above listed experience, if I had it to do over, 4× would best serve my needs and wants. Those scopes have delivered such reliable service for so long, I won't replace them unless they break. Even then the Leupold is warrantied for life.
Mike
N454casull
Of course I do. Why do you think I started this thread.
Gun control laws make about as much sense as taking ex-lax to cure a cough.
ECHO...ECHO....echo...
Ah......One savors the hypocrisy!
Karma.........It’s a bitch.
On a turkey gun, a simple duplex crosshair with fixed/straight 1x magnification is perfect. All I need is a hold point in case the birds come in close.
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
As it stands right now:
- .243 Win has a 4-12 (my logic being it would also be my coyote gun)
- 7mm08 has a 3.5-10 (let's be real, that's just slick marketing to make Leupold's VX-3i stand out from the other 3-9 optics out there)
- 7mm Rem Mag has a 3-9 (once I get the gun shooting the way I want, I'll probably put a new optic on it. Solid chance that optic is a 4.5-14x40 VX-3i, or Vortex's equivalent)
I've got a spare 2-7 laying around that I've considered putting on the 7mm08, and then moving the 3.5-10 to the 7mm Rem Mag, but I haven't done it yet and quite possibly won't. I've got that 7mm08 set up juuuuuuuust right and I really don't want to mess with it.
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast, and speed is the economy of motion" - Scott Jedlinski
The 223 has a N/F4x14 F1 Shv
The 6.5x55, has a N/F 2.5-10x42
The 6.5-06 has a S&B PM11 4-12x50
The 30 06 has a 2.5-10 Leica
The 9.3x62 has a 2.5-8 VX3 Leupy.
So for me less is better so long as glass quality is good and clicks where used are repeatable.
Reuters, Dec 2020.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Job = Tool
"The Un-Tactical"
(Except for chisels...they’re screwdrivers).