Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
Varmintmist
Senior MemberPosts: 7,995 Senior Member
Another reason
that I will vote for the current pres again.
It's boring, and your lack of creativity knows no bounds.
Replies
Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., the ranking member of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, said this rule would do little to help anyone find work. All the rule change does is strip people from accessing the benefit, she said.
"This Administration is out of touch with families who are struggling to make ends meet by working seasonal jobs or part time jobs with unreliable hours," Stabenow said. "Seasonal holiday workers, workers in Northern Michigan’s tourism industry, and workers with unreliable hours like waiters and waitresses are the kinds of workers hurt by this proposal."
The rule change:
The USDA rule change affects people between the ages of 18 and 49 who are childless and not disabled.
In other words, able-bodied childless people who should effin' working.
Adam J. McCleod
I don’t much care for Trump, but no able bodied adult should be getting paid to sit on their ass. We should not be helping people who do not seek to help themselves. On this I am inclined to side with the President.
ECHO...ECHO....echo...
Ah......One savors the hypocrisy!
Karma.........It’s a bitch.
Some time later I saw this person in the local Walmart in the checkout line. He had separate baskets on the conveyor. One basket (food items) was paid with some government debit card and the other basket (beer, junk food, toys) was paid with his personal debit card.
I guess managing this lifestyle is easier than working 44 hours per week.
Adam J. McCleod
I'd be more likely to wonder why a 40 hr weeks pay leaves an employee qualified for food stamps? Seems like a reliable hand out is better than 4 hrs over time maybe not available next week.
I don't think there's that many people on assistance that don't work. I think its a BS narrative. Albeit an effective one, that distracts and diverts attention from where the money really goes, and focuses it on the ever present those people on which the Republican right is so dependent for their slight of hand agenda. Of course I never read Ayn Rand. Maybe there's more dead beats in there.
Im not opposed to the rule. Sounds great. Im not holding my breath waiting for my life to improve as a result either.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
ECHO...ECHO....echo...
Ah......One savors the hypocrisy!
Karma.........It’s a bitch.
This is not what is in place today. And will never be as long as folks like Bernie, Kamala and the Native American, Lizzie Unicon Farts are pandering to the slugs of society buying their votes with more freebies.
ECHO...ECHO....echo...
Ah......One savors the hypocrisy!
Karma.........It’s a bitch.
ECHO...ECHO....echo...
Ah......One savors the hypocrisy!
Karma.........It’s a bitch.
My favorite is the interviews. Start asking relevant questions and the "candidate" says, "I'm just here to keep my unemployment going."
Adam J. McCleod
I contacted a head hunter who got me an interview with a company there. I flew in, interviewed, and came home the same day with a job. Four years later I changed jobs, and had the same experience. I had a job offer in less than a few days after interviewing.
I realize that this is not the way it always (usually?) works, and I've long maintained that a human resources department is the largest impediment to a person getting a job with a company, or a company hiring the right personnel.
It's too bad that companies have such requirements when trying to fill vacancies. I don't know if it's strictly company policy, or government mandated.
Gun control laws make about as much sense as taking ex-lax to cure a cough.
On the other edge of the universe I was courted by TWO different executives at another big company and after getting verbals from both of them that I was the guy they wanted in both cases HR came in at the last moment and inserted an internal candidate that had been displaced and they had to find a hole for.