Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
bullsi1911
Posts: 12,434 Senior Member
“Open Fields” you do not have a right to privacy on private (land) property

https://www.agweb.com/article/government-cameras-hidden-private-property-welcome-open-fields?fbclid=IwAR2sBp1iw-wFt1popZ58ESHYhHTHpV94mHmHmwlZX_78B-PfRF264aqQC0U
I had never heard about this, but it seems to be a well established precedent. You have a right to be secure in your house and the immediately surrounding area. But not on your back 40, remote property, in the woods, fields, etc....
Govt can put electronic monitoring devices on your peppery, and have an armed raid on your home if you remove those cameras.
How messed up is that?
I had never heard about this, but it seems to be a well established precedent. You have a right to be secure in your house and the immediately surrounding area. But not on your back 40, remote property, in the woods, fields, etc....
Govt can put electronic monitoring devices on your peppery, and have an armed raid on your home if you remove those cameras.
How messed up is that?
To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Replies
Better to have unsightly boxes on the trees than unwanted eyes.
Gun control laws make about as much sense as taking ex-lax to cure a cough.
Just load a bunch of porn on the cards, then make an anonymous call to the state ethics hotline and report that the squirrel sheriff is using state equipment to view porn.
Or shoot the cam from out of view.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Sounds like another nail in Liberty's coffin to me, but I will concede that I have a bad attitude about that whole subject.
― Douglas Adams