Home Main Category General Firearms

Zee The Enabler (PC Carbine)

BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
I don't know if Zee is really all that much to blame here.  I mean, really, it shoots work-supplied ammo and eats it out of mags made by Glock.  Kinda no-brainy, really.



Got the State Compliance version - which probably would have been my choice regardless.  That will become clear to y'all as I move toward certain aesthetic choices.



Ruger was kind enough to include a metal M-lok rail with three mounting bolts (SOLID!)  Given that this is a takedown gun, attaching all the sighting systems to the half with the barrel would seem to make sense.  The Holosun HC515CM came with an AR riser between the sight and the throw-lever base - easy enough to remove.



I shot a few rounds through it before I installed the MCARBO brake.  It's a REALLY nice piece of well-machined steel, but I really can't feel any difference.  The gun shoots really flat as it is (tungsten dead-blow weight in the bolt body), and a 147 grain / 1000 fps 9mm load probably doesn't have enough gas pressure left at the end of a 16" barrel to properly energize it.  Oh well. . .it's on and not hurting anything.

Other than that. . The conversion from Ruger magwell to Glock was idiot-simple. I moved the charging handle to the left side to make it more AR-like, and took the spacers out of the stock to get the length down.  Extra bits of Mag Pul rail installed in preparation for the flashlight I don't have yet.  The sling is on,  but you're gonna have to wait to see that. ;)

I got it on paper at 25 yards in preparation for a 75 yard zero, which should have about 3" of drop at 100.  Proper accuracy testing to follow, and I will probably use real duty loads for the deed.  Having taken a few apart for measurements, Winchester's Q.C. on "the good stuff" seems really excellent.  Given that neither the gun, nor the ammo are advertised with the word "MATCH", it's probably the best we can do.

Initial impressions though:

1. After about 100-150 rounds It's a stupid-fun little carbine that's very controllable and would make anyone who does not want the weight or recoil of a shotgun a dandy choice for H.D.

Truthfully, I'm partially evaluating it as a shotgun alternative.  If Remington does NOT stop their spiral down the drain, and the Fountain Of Parts for the 870 dries up, some re-evaluation will be necessary.

2.  Reliability excellent with 147 grain training loads.  Had one failure to feed, which I chalk up entirely to a problematic mag that had some plastic flashing left inside that made loading difficult.  It literally is a big 10/22 takedown, and I'm probably going to treat it like one - see just how much soot it can handle.

3.  With 147 grain subsonic loads expanding all their gas in 16" worth of barrel, it is louder than a suppressed MP5. . .but not by a whole heck of a lot.  Possibly less ear-splitting than high-vel .22's. . .and that's REALLY NEAT!

If you're on the fence, I'd suggest jumping.  It's FUN! :p


WWJMBD?

"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee

Replies

  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,429 Senior Member
    Love mine. 

    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,429 Senior Member
    Not a big fan (AT ALL) of putting an optic on a free float(movable) forend. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • earlyagainearlyagain Posts: 7,928 Senior Member
    Very ingenious.

    A thousand and one uses. Carries, stores, and aims with the ease of wand.....
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    Zee said:
    Not a big fan (AT ALL) of putting an optic on a free float(movable) forend. 
    I definitely hear ya. I am likewise not a fan of forward-mounted optics, but the handguard does seem to be a rather rigid beastie.  The $64,000 question is:  Is there more potential for play between the barrel and handguard than between the barrel and receiver via the T.D. joint?

    Iron sights attached to AR handguards rather than the barrel seem to run acceptably enough provided the handguard install is done right, so I don't think this is any kind of heinous sin.  All of 30 seconds required to move it to the receiver so it's not like we're committed.
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,429 Senior Member
    From my testing, it only took one round for the zero to return after reinstalling the barrel. And the first round wasn’t off more than 1” at 25yrds. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • AntonioAntonio Posts: 2,986 Senior Member
    Bigslug said:

    2.  Reliability excellent with 147 grain training loads.  Had one failure to feed, which I chalk up entirely to a problematic mag that had some plastic flashing left inside that made loading difficult.  It literally is a big 10/22 takedown, and I'm probably going to treat it like one - see just how much soot it can handle.






    From firing my friends' PCs I can say that that's the most accurate description of this rifle so far. They do work with both local iffy reloads and factory production and let's say that although here some owners don't have the neatest gun care ethics, have yet to see one show a critical fail.

    Would love to own one but alas! not the place nor the time. Would be a great option over my M-1 Carbine since its age, heavier punch and ammo price makes it not so range-friendly compared to these Rugers.
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    Zee said:
    Love mine. 

    I love the folding brace pistol concept.  I can't say that I'm in love with the full size carbine idea.  but in any case great execution in Ruger's part and they do have themselves a winner there.
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    GunNut said:  I can't say that I'm in love with the full size carbine idea.
    It took me a long time to get there, but:

    1.  Seeing how widely you can tweak the capabilities of pistol rounds by switching from stuff that expands to stuff that doesn't. . .

    2.  That when your primary range peaks out at only 180 yards, and it's really only flat for the first 100 of that. . .

    3.  That many folks really suck with handguns and don't have the time or inclination to get proficient with one. . .

    4.  That the long barrel is basically a silencer. . .

    I think #1 on that list was really what settled it.  We USED TO think that matching lever gun ammo to one's revolver made sense, then we got into the era where everybody thought it was impossible to kill anything unless the bullet mushroomed itself inside out, penetration went down the toilet, and we started taking it for granted that rifles had to be howitzers to get anything done.  I'm gonna have a nice stash of 147 grain flat point FMJ's and probably an obscene one of 135 grain cast WFN's.  Should be capable of solving a great many problems that are on the same football field (Like I'd EVER be on a football field. . . :D)
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    You do make some compelling points.
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    GunNut said:
    You do make some compelling points.
    Learning that six feet or more of water is what it takes to stop heavy-for-caliber, non-expanding .45 and 9mm bullets was a thing that really made me go "Hmmmmmm".  I'm not about to advocate trading in your .300 Win Mags for 1911's or Glock 17's as your primary elk guns, but I'm no longer in the camp that says the .300 WIn Mag is "necessary".  A lot of big game fell to revolver-caliber rifles and comparatively gutless muzzleloaders long before we took the hit from Roy Weatherby's bong (Or was his coke straw?  He was all about "speed").

    Thus, these carbines are probably capable of being the answer to a lot more questions than our raised-in-the-'70's-and-'80's conditioning would initially make us think.  Trajectory- and noise-wise, they're a .22LR with mass and diameter.  Potentially, that's a pretty useful tool.
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • AntonioAntonio Posts: 2,986 Senior Member
    That's because for not a few people some once-in-a-lifetime scenarios have become the rule of thumb for lots of firearms use in the field. Many think they'd face a mix of Grizzly bear attack/1986 Miami shootout/ L.A. bank standoff and assume that if they don't have a mix of .300 WM semiauto battle rifle with 500 AP rounds to spare and thermal sniper optics, sided by a .500 S&W semiauto ported, silenced and optic-equipped high-cap pistol with another 200 rounds in mags, they're as undergunned as kid carrying a Daisy Red Ryder.
  • Uncle FesterUncle Fester Posts: 1,644 Senior Member
    I like mine carbine and the comparison to the 10/22 is pretty good.  The only issue is weight - my Carbine is heavier than it needs to be - a modern Tommy Gun.  

    My belief, the barrel of the Charger is too short and the Carbine barrel is too long (for legal reasons). Ruger would do well to build a pistol somewhere in the middle. 
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    I like mine carbine and the comparison to the 10/22 is pretty good.  The only issue is weight - my Carbine is heavier than it needs to be - a modern Tommy Gun.  
    I've been mulling over that and did a quick websurf compare - depending on the exact versions, we're within a few ounces up or down of the MP5 and the STEN.  Seven pounds naked, give or take.

    If they'd done a locked breech instead of a blowback, there would be no need for the tungsten weights in the bolt, but that starts to get away from the "simple" that is often sought in such things.

    I moved the optic back onto the receiver today - feeling pretty good about that.  Proper 75 yard zero and shoot for group Friday! :)
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,429 Senior Member
    I like mine carbine and the comparison to the 10/22 is pretty good.  The only issue is weight - my Carbine is heavier than it needs to be - a modern Tommy Gun.  

    My belief, the barrel of the Charger is too short and the Carbine barrel is too long (for legal reasons). Ruger would do well to build a pistol somewhere in the middle. 
    I agree. Would like the Charger to be about 10”-12”. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • CHIRO1989CHIRO1989 Posts: 14,852 Senior Member
    How hard would it be to re-barrel the Charger?
    I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
  • shotgunshooter3shotgunshooter3 Posts: 6,114 Senior Member
    CHIRO1989 said:
    How hard would it be to re-barrel the Charger?
    It's a QD/takedown barrel assembly, so literally seconds with no tools. 
    - I am a rifleman with a poorly chosen screen name. -
    "Slow is smooth, smooth is fast, and speed is the economy of motion" - Scott Jedlinski
  • AntonioAntonio Posts: 2,986 Senior Member
    Is there weight that you can shed in this gun to make it lighter? Barrel's already fluted, stock plastic and the rest aluminum so considering that you need that heavy bolt for the system to work and most would choose some kind of optics over the factory sights, don't see where you can reduce even a few ounces.

    I like the gun's weight anyway; don't mind reasonably heavier-than-average rifles since they usually give you a steady shooting platform and almost none will be carried around in field conditions for more than brief periods. Maybe some 2-gun scenarios now and then.....


  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    Antonio said:
    Is there weight that you can shed in this gun to make it lighter? Barrel's already fluted, stock plastic and the rest aluminum so considering that you need that heavy bolt for the system to work and most would choose some kind of optics over the factory sights, don't see where you can reduce even a few ounces.

    I like the gun's weight anyway; don't mind reasonably heavier-than-average rifles since they usually give you a steady shooting platform and almost none will be carried around in field conditions for more than brief periods. Maybe some 2-gun scenarios now and then.....


    It's funny because every time I pick up my 7.5" AR SBR I wonder why it's so heavy.  after all the gun is aluminum for the most part...
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,104 Senior Member
    If you really want to get into the weeds on AR weights and how much everything weighs, check this out.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1I6Qb6kAJjChEJ56qhznv2291c5UHRDyNXuSXGObumqM/edit#gid=1281452680

    It's from 2017, so there's new components out there....



    Meh.
  • TugarTugar Posts: 2,479 Senior Member
    I've wondered about weight savings myself. It will never be an M1 Carbine. The controls and feel are all there. Just needs a diet of about two pound. I may take the stock off and weigh it. 

    The thing I really want is the collapsible  wire stock


    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    Winston Churchill
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    Tugar said:
    I've wondered about weight savings myself. It will never be an M1 Carbine. The controls and feel are all there. Just needs a diet of about two pound. I may take the stock off and weigh it. 

    The thing I really want is the collapsible  wire stock


    They are fun!  I have one in my safe that's EXACTLY like the one on the photo below.  Not standard military issue but apparently they were popular with the first MAC-SOG guys that went to Vietnam as advisors.  I believe bought with their own money and made by non-military civilian manufacturer Iver Johnson.  The wire stock collapses into the wood stock.


  • TugarTugar Posts: 2,479 Senior Member
    edited May 2021 #23
    In case anyone needs/wants to know, the factory Ruger PC Carbine Stock, Forend, and Magwell weigh 2.156 lbs, Stock+Magwell = 1.648 lbs, Forend = 0.508 lbs, and the Magwell = 0.117 lbs.

    That means the stock weighs 2.039 pounds or 32.62 ounces or 924.87 grams. Seems like that is the best place to lose some weight.

    ***Note that is for the normal pc carbine. Not my pic.


    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    Winston Churchill
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    Or. . .you could just shoot more of these on your alternate days, and the "excessive weight" will cease to bother you:



     :p 
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • AntonioAntonio Posts: 2,986 Senior Member
    GunNut said:
    Tugar said:
    I've wondered about weight savings myself. It will never be an M1 Carbine. The controls and feel are all there. Just needs a diet of about two pound. I may take the stock off and weigh it. 

    The thing I really want is the collapsible  wire stock


    They are fun!  I have one in my safe that's EXACTLY like the one on the photo below.  Not standard military issue but apparently they were popular with the first MAC-SOG guys that went to Vietnam as advisors.  I believe bought with their own money and made by non-military civilian manufacturer Iver Johnson.  The wire stock collapses into the wood stock.


    Never a fan of those wire stocks; from the pic it was probably a selective-fire M-2 that acted more as a subgun for very close quarter engagements than a shouldered rifle, was lighter than the M3/M1A1s and probably had a ton of available ammo everywhere in the area. Also most users were trained in those and knew how to service them so the reasonable choice.

    I have an original "paratrooper stock" to turn my Inland M-1 into an M1A1 and other than reducing its size for more comfortable transport, it does less than nothing to allow even relatively accurate simiauto fire beyond 50 yards when unfolded, and have tried those wire stocks like the one in the photo and at least to me they aren't better  in neither ergonomics or for steady aim.
    Probably the only service guns with such kind of folding stocks I've ever found reasonably comfortable and useful when shooting were in the NK AKMs our cops have, the 5.56 Galils and the German MP-40.


  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,868 Senior Member
    FRUSTRATING day today, but she shows promise:



    Picked up Dad and left his place in calm conditions.  Got to range in 30MPH gusts - not only NOT ideal for testing a slow, non-streamlined bullet, but also NOT ideal conditions for keeping one's target stand from blowing over. . .repeatedly. . .despite attempts to weigh it down.  Soooooo. . .meaningful science NOT concluded. 

    Online trajectory computers seem to indicate that a 75 yard zero is probably the ideal thing, so had to set up a portable target stand as our range's fixed backers are at 50 and 100.

    Got this first group fired. . .four out of five into about 1.5" at 75 yards.  Not too shabby for pistol ammo, a 2 MOA red dot, and a takedown gun.  Then the stand blew over.

    Made some adjustments to the red dot, reset the stand, and got a group that was more like 6" wide by 3" tall.  Stand blew over again.  Reset - blew over again before I could get another group off.  Said "SCREW IT!" and took my frustrations out on cans and water bottles.  

    Not much definitive to be stated, I'm afraid.  Wind and uncertain zero factored in, I'm pretty confident it'll stay inside 3-4" at 100 yards on a calm day - - but this was one where staying in bed would have been the better call.  To be continued another day. :#
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • TugarTugar Posts: 2,479 Senior Member
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    Winston Churchill
  • TugarTugar Posts: 2,479 Senior Member
    Never mind. Just realized you have to buy their damned chassis to make that work. Just trying to lighten that pig of a stock.

    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    Winston Churchill
  • Uncle FesterUncle Fester Posts: 1,644 Senior Member
    Tugar said:
    I was hoping it was one of the Knuckles that allow the conversion of a carbine chassis into a side folder.  
  • TugarTugar Posts: 2,479 Senior Member
    edited May 2021 #30
    Ok. Had to take mine apart to verify a few things. For one. My stock at least is well below 2 pounds.


    The action scoped is 3 pounds WITH the Bushnell red dot attached. 






    Finally, the barrel and foreend


    Which bring us to 116 ounces or 7.25 pounds with the Bushnell red dot and add an ounce or two for the sling which I didn't weigh. It feels like a pig but all the weight is in the barrel and action so there really isn't much that can be pared down in my estimation. . 

    The attachment point on the back doesn't look too difficult. 

    The magpul stock is estimated to weigh about 2 ounces MORE than the one I have, so that's out. 

    Still love the carbine. 
    Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.
    Winston Churchill
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement