Home› Main Category› General Firearms
Zee
Posts: 28,430 Senior Member
Bond Arms Derringer - My Little Friend

Picked up my Bond Arms Roughneck on Thursday! Have been shooting it for a couple days and have to say, this gun is painfully fun!

Saddled on up to the target at 3 feet and the gun went, “click”. Opened the action and saw a very light primer strike. Closed it, cycled the barrels, and tried again, “click”. With another light primer strike. Put it in the top barrel and, “bang”! Ded snek!
Thats gonna be a problem I need to figure out. Is it a barrel issue or an ammo issue.
I then switched to 230gr FMJ ammo (just to save my handloads) and tried 7/15/20 yards with just the top barrel. Spot on at 7, climbed at 15, so I aimed low at 20 in order to stay on the 12” plate.








Plan is for this to be a ranch/property Gun while doing labor. So, the first thing I wanted to know was would it kill snakes? From experience shooting my friends Bond Arms, I knew I wanted the defensive round in the top barrel as it tends to be more POA/POI and that the bottom barrel would be for snake shot.

Thats gonna be a problem I need to figure out. Is it a barrel issue or an ammo issue.
Switched to my somewhat warm 200gr Speer GD handloads and moved back to 3 yards. The top barrel was spot on with no issues. The bottom barrel was a little low as suspected.

At 10yrds, the barrels show their propensity to climb and dive with distance.

At 10yrds, the barrels show their propensity to climb and dive with distance.

I then switched to 230gr FMJ ammo (just to save my handloads) and tried 7/15/20 yards with just the top barrel. Spot on at 7, climbed at 15, so I aimed low at 20 in order to stay on the 12” plate.

Velocity wise, I’m rather impressed. Out of a meager 2.5” barrel, my 200gr GD handloads still clock 880 fps!!!


I was honestly expecting less.
On the expansion test, it was a three jugger from 5 yards. Breaking the back of the third jug and coming to rest inside.



Pretty dramatic from such a little gun and not bad expansion for the velocity.




The trigger is different in that it’s a pivot system that requires more of a downward pull than a straight back press. On top of that, yeah, it’s pretty wicked heavy. Enough so, that I have to hold the gun differently in my hand in order to get enough finger on the trigger to pull the trigger.....down. Normally, I like a trigger on the middle of my fingers pad. For this gun, I have to place the joint of my first knuckle on the trigger to get the leverage I need. Doing this placed the rear knuckle of my thumb on the backstrap of the gun. Not so fun in recoil!
Nothing about this gun is fast. No fast draw. Cocking the barrel, getting the right grip, aiming, and that 20lb trigger pull.
Nothing about this gun is fast. No fast draw. Cocking the barrel, getting the right grip, aiming, and that 20lb trigger pull.
A fun gun.......yes. A useful gun.......for snakes and wildlife........yes. Ain’t no way in Hell this is a serious bad human defensive option. Not unless you can freeze time and get ready for the fight.
But, I still love it because it’s cool and different. Think I’m going to get a 3.5” barrel in 9mm for the gun as well. Seeing as how barrels are interchangeable.
After all the serious testing..........then came the hold my beer testing. Stay tuned.........
"To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
Replies
N454casull
So, my philosophy of: If you can see it, you can hit it.
Still holds true.
"The Un-Tactical"
I've been fortunate in my rattlesnake encounters thus far - sufficient distance on sighting which allowed me to stand off, say "howdy little feller", and go our separate ways. My thinking is if one wanted to force the issue, I would want to blast quickly and repeatedly - not fumble with a single action hammer without enough grip to cock quickly, re-grip after cocking, maintain sights through a heavy trigger, repeat for #2. . .
I think it is DAMN COOL that you're pushing the boundaries with the thing. Always fun to treat it like it's the only tool you're ever going to have and really wring the tool out.
Best advice I can give:
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
Never wanted a derringer. Now I find myself wanting a centerfire version.
Winston Churchill
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again! -- Mark Twain
Those 45ACP shotshells have only pissed me off in several guns- especially revolvers.
-Mikhail Kalashnikov
Target was 18”x24”.
Keep the loaded case mouth crimped no smaller than .473 and they should head space 100%.
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again! -- Mark Twain
I've done penetration testing with both the .38 S&W / .380/200 and .455 Webleys down in the 600 fps range and got results in the 5-7 milk jug range (4 if you count the wadcutter-ish .455 MKIV bullet). Considering your average expanding duty load stops in 3-4, I imagine good old GI hardball will still serve, even with significant velocity loss.
TIP: Some WEIRD bullet dynamics can happen with speeds that low. I took part in a science project to confirm if the .380/200 British MKI bullet actually does tumble on impact (it can), and I did that by cutting soda cans into sheets and placing them in between my milk jugs. The metal gave me a nice register of a sideways bullet profile - much like a Wile E. Coyote-shaped crater.
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee