Home Main Category General Firearms

Kimber now makes a Glock……like handgun. Just announced today.

2

Replies

  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    buckaroo said:
    One need not go to Afghanistan to know it's a ****-hole.
    But, saying it is because you’ve been there holds more merit than simply because you were told. 

    Or, so I understand. Yes?  

    Experience speaks volumes. No?

    Regurgitating information makes you a parrot, right?
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • buckaroobuckaroo Posts: 67 Member
    edited August 2021 #33
    Point well taken.
    Unfortunately it's all some of us can go by, to expensive to get stuck with junk.
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,405 Senior Member
    buckaroo said:
    Enjoy your new Kimber.
    Don't own one.  I posted this just for information and to inspire intelligent discussion.  Your reading skills need....... fine tuning.

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • buckaroobuckaroo Posts: 67 Member
    I was born a poor White child.  :)
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    edited August 2021 #36
    buckaroo said:
    Point well taken.
    Unfortunately it's all some of us can go by, to expensive to get stuck with junk.
    I agree, a high expense doesn’t make a product necessarily good and a low cost doesn’t make something automatically crap. 

    There are lemons at the top and bottom of the tree. 

    Finding the good ones takes experience. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    Let's see...
    Straight trigger
    U-notch rear sight
    Tritium sights!  You don't want to appendix carry that - the radiation would be too near the wedding tackle
    Lots of texture
    Potentially high bore axis
    Sold with a red dot (batteries!)
    The back of the mag release is flat, but the scallop it sits in is round.
    Looks like there's 7 rear serrations, while a mako shark has 5 gill slits.  
    Also, mako sharks are more blue than black...
    What more can people not like?

    I do find it interesting that the slide's not open on the top, but rather has the ejection port on the side (see photo).  Some have said that will lessen the likelihood of stuff getting into the action when carried AIWB or IWB. That seems like it would be dubious.  Kimber says it's to keep stuff from getting onto the optic, and that seems like a good idea.  


    So should I have included "It's a Kimber" to my list of things for people not to like?
    Meh.
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    I will say this: I've become less a fan of forward serrations on iron sight handguns, but with those running red dots, I can see where they're coming back into practicality.
    Meh.
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,405 Senior Member
    edited August 2021 #39
    Zee said:
    buckaroo said:
    Point well taken.
    Unfortunately it's all some of us can go by, to expensive to get stuck with junk.
    I agree, a high expense doesn’t make a product necessarily good and a low cost doesn’t make something automatically crap. 

    There are lemons at the top and bottom of the tree. 

    Finding the good ones takes experience. 
    This is correct.  I do not judge things by the price, I judge things by the value they bring to me, and I've found exceptional values all over the price spectrum.  Folks laugh when I show them a nice gun stuck inside an Uncle Mikes soft fabric $12 IWB holster.  Hey they work!

    What I don't think is fair, and I find it curious when other do so I question it, is crap all over others choices AND question their intelligence/motives/common sense based on MY inability to afford the item in question, specially when I do not know them personally.  A fellow might not have a checkbook that can sustain a Ferrari, but calling one overpriced junk because of that I think makes no sense.  

    I feel that doing the same here with guns is beneath the standard we try to maintain in this forum, no?

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,405 Senior Member
    I will say this: I've become less a fan of forward serrations on iron sight handguns, but with those running red dots, I can see where they're coming back into practicality.
    I've never had a strong opinion on them either way.  Not really sure why they elicit one, is it aesthetics?  I'm asking because of curiosity, I really have never given it much thought.

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    Aesthetics, they seem to accumulate more gunk than the rearward serrations, and I just really don't use them, so they're not needed, so why have them?  I understand that I'm in the minority on that sort of thing, so unless I buy custom, off-the-rack stuff will have a few items I don't want or need.  

    I know some folks hate them because they put your hand too close to the muzzle.  I guess they do if you're a smooth-brained manipulator, but if that's the case maybe you shouldn't be handling a firearm.  
    Meh.
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    Mr. B,
    I would again ask you strongly to tone your attitude down.
    Please act like an adult enough to agree or disagree with someone else's opinions, without attacking the person(s) you disagree with.
    Having a mini-tantrum or trying to act like a bully won't work here.
    We encourage strong debate with facts, but do so respecting the people you are engaging, or your time here will be short lived.
    I get it that you may be an angry person, but when you combine that with immaturity and a lack of self-control you will not get far in real relationships or in a forum like this.
    How about you just stop on this thread, and start a new one, and show us what you like to shoot (Pics and range reports are great) or what you like to hunt or collect.
    If you ever want your voice to ever have a chance of being accepted here (Currently it is not IMO), show us what brings you enjoyment, lighten up and have some fun.  
    We might yet learn some cool things, and and maybe you will too.
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • buckaroobuckaroo Posts: 67 Member
    edited August 2021 #43
    Mr. B,

    I would again ask you strongly to tone your attitude down.
    Having a mini-tantrum or trying to act like a bully won't work here.

    Is this reverse psychology or something here ?  The private messaging must be working over time.
    Rest assured Ernie I'm no bully.   And the fake persecution complex gets old.


  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    Aesthetics, they seem to accumulate more gunk than the rearward serrations, and I just really don't use them, so they're not needed, so why have them?  I understand that I'm in the minority on that sort of thing, so unless I buy custom, off-the-rack stuff will have a few items I don't want or need.  

    I know some folks hate them because they put your hand too close to the muzzle.  I guess they do if you're a smooth-brained manipulator, but if that's the case maybe you shouldn't be handling a firearm.  
    I like the way they look and they are handy for a from underneath press check. That’s about it for me.
    They are too far forward of my support hand for in use slide manipulation and they scrape the inside of every holster I use them in. Wearing the holster and finish on the gun, as well as collecting shavings and gunk, as you mentioned. 

    They aren’t a deal breaker. Just not a need to have. And they have more detraction a for me than benefits. Just the way I run a gun, at least. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    Zee said:


    They aren’t a deal breaker. Just not a need to have. And they have more detraction a for me than benefits. Just the way I run a gun, at least. 
    That's where I am:  I don't need them, but I'm not going to pay more not to have them than to get a commonly sold firearm that has them.  
    Meh.
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,405 Senior Member
    Aesthetics, they seem to accumulate more gunk than the rearward serrations, and I just really don't use them, so they're not needed, so why have them?  I understand that I'm in the minority on that sort of thing, so unless I buy custom, off-the-rack stuff will have a few items I don't want or need.  

    I know some folks hate them because they put your hand too close to the muzzle.  I guess they do if you're a smooth-brained manipulator, but if that's the case maybe you shouldn't be handling a firearm.  
    They do accumulate junk especially from leather holsters.  Thanks for the explanation!  

    I would probably look at them more critically if offered a choice.  I put together a faux 43X when I decided to try out the slide of the 43 I already owned on a 43X-48 frame I bought on GB before the 43X was widely available.  Then later, after I decided I really liked the gun I bough a true 43X for myself and passed the original to the wife.

    I do like the look of her FrankenGlock 43X better than my newer actual 43X because the regular 43 slide does not have the front serrations, but that is strictly aesthetics.  I use I can't really find much of a difference so I carry them interchangeably.

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,280 Senior Member
    Jay said:
    Somebody has to do it, since Sam isn't around any more to catch the inevitable grammar mistakes around here.  :D
    Yea, good ol' Sam, Goddess rest his soul! Miss that guy.
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,405 Senior Member
    Yeah he was interesting for sure. 

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • JayJay Posts: 4,629 Senior Member
    Zee said:

    I like the way they look and they are handy for a from underneath press check. That’s about it for me.
    They are too far forward of my support hand for in use slide manipulation and they scrape the inside of every holster I use them in. Wearing the holster and finish on the gun, as well as collecting shavings and gunk, as you mentioned. 

    They aren’t a deal breaker. Just not a need to have. And they have more detraction a for me than benefits. Just the way I run a gun, at least. 
    Pretty much exactly what I was going to post before getting to this comment. The only thing I use them for is for a press check, which I can do just fine without them. 
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    It does not appeal to me at first glance.  Looking forward to thoughts once we have some here actually handling one.
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,280 Senior Member

    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • buckaroobuckaroo Posts: 67 Member
    Jayhawker said:

    I have had enough of your crap...your constant crap-stirring and personal attacks are going to stop...NOW... We are not going to have this discussion again,
    Don't feel bad BMW's suck to.   I'm out'a here, if I fart in the wrong direction you'll most likely band me.
    Nice meeting you.
  • JayhawkerJayhawker Posts: 18,358 Senior Member
    buckaroo said:
    Jayhawker said:

    I have had enough of your crap...your constant crap-stirring and personal attacks are going to stop...NOW... We are not going to have this discussion again,
    Don't feel bad BMW's suck to.   I'm out'a here, if I fart in the wrong direction you'll most likely band me.
    Nice meeting you.
    I used to band calves...that ain't what I have in mind...
    Sharps Model 1874 - "The rifle that made the west safe for Winchester"
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    edited August 2021 #55
    buckaroo said:
    Jayhawker said:

    I have had enough of your crap...your constant crap-stirring and personal attacks are going to stop...NOW... We are not going to have this discussion again,
    Don't feel bad BMW's suck to.   I'm out'a here, if I fart in the wrong direction you'll most likely band me.
    Nice meeting you.
    Don’t be stupid. Be human. With a brain. 
    We like humans. With brains. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    edited August 2021 #56
    Well………so much for brains. Rock On, Dude!!

    😁
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,280 Senior Member
    I think he just flounced out...
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    edited August 2021 #58
    zorba said:
    I think he just flounced out...
    I don’t want
    to know what that word means. 
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • zorbazorba Posts: 25,280 Senior Member
    Zee said:
    zorba said:
    I think he just flounced out...
    I don’t what to know what that word means. 
    In this context, picture someone in a big full skirt with a ruffled hem, who - after chewing out all and sundry present - swirls the skirt dramatically and exits like a Drama Queen. S/he told us! The term refers to bottom trim/hem, a "Flounce".
    I often add flounces to the bottom edge of my dance skirts to make them a few inches longer and add pizazz!
    -Zorba, "The Veiled Male"

    "If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
    )O(
  • ZeeZee Posts: 28,387 Senior Member
    Please. No videos of you as an example. 
    😁
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Posts: 8,609 Senior Member
    Oh my... :D
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement