Home› Main Category› General Firearms
Justsomedude
Posts: 1,463 Senior Member
Tritium vs FO
What's your preferred sights between the two? I install quite a bit of both and there's obviously a pretty sizeable price gap between the two but I'm always surprised when people go for the tritium. They do "glow" but it's nearly unnoticeable unless you're in an extremely low light condition or straight darkness. In that case, it seems that you're going to have other problems to worry about besides finding your sights. I tend to like the FO more because they stand out with even latent light. Just curious what the general consensus is?
We've been conditioned to believe that obedience is virtuous and voting is freedom-
Replies
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎
1. The red dot is now my night sight.
2. With the 500+ lumen lights slung beneath most pistols these days, self-illuminating sights are almost irrelevant.
3. Replacing them every 5-7 years - especially on a gun that will be running a red dot as the primary - is a costly PITA.
4. Im still in the early stages of coming to grips with presbyopia. I'd RATHER have solid black up front, but in lower light, I need some help figuring out where the center of the blur is.
Still not 100% sold. May go to a tritium front with a screaming green outline.
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
"Slow is smooth, smooth is fast, and speed is the economy of motion" - Scott Jedlinski
But, there is the warm glow of my night lights…
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎