Home Main Category General Firearms

Seems like Bump stocks are back…

Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,407 Senior Member
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/fifth-circuit-mandates-ruling-in-favor-of-plaintiff-in-cargill-v-garland-legalizing-bump-stocks-in-three-states/

At least in 3 states… Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

From the article:
“Three other circuits have upheld the ATF’s ban. The Fifth Circuit’s order officially creates a Circuit Court split, setting up an almost certain review by the Supreme Court which could go much farther than just bump stocks, possibly limiting the extent to which regulatory agencies and the administrative state are free to “interpret,” alter, and create laws. “


It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

Replies

  • GrapeApeGrapeApe Posts: 584 Senior Member
    Good
    "For longer range, use a bigger case. For bigger game, use a bigger bullet." - Dan Johnson
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,754 Senior Member
    While I have no use for bump stocks or binary triggers, it is the correct decision and will certainly make others look at Government Agency overreaching 
    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
  • PFDPFD Posts: 1,898 Senior Member
    Diver43 said:
    While I have no use for bump stocks or binary triggers, it is the correct decision and will certainly make others look at Government Agency overreaching 

    This. 
    Laws should be made by elected officials.
    That's all I got.

    Paul
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,407 Senior Member
    Agree on all counts.  The ATF has overreached their powers on just about all aspects of firearms issues while being outside the reach of the voting population.

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • bullsi1911bullsi1911 Posts: 12,426 Senior Member
    Michael Cargill is a badass. He is local to me, and I kinda know the guy. My wife and several friends took thier CHL classes from him, and he is a straight up defender of the 2nd Amendment. 

    This is such great news 
    To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
    -Mikhail Kalashnikov
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    edited March 2 #7
    Too bad we didn't have a Republican as POTUS, AG, and a Republican Congress when the rule happened to keep the ATF from making that ruling.

    Oh, wait... 
    Meh.
  • bullsi1911bullsi1911 Posts: 12,426 Senior Member
    Yep. And too bad we had a huge amount of gun owners who were willing to let the bump stocks get thrown under the bus in the hope they would not go after more. 

    Appeasing tyranny never works. 
    To make something simple is a thousand times more difficult than to make something complex.
    -Mikhail Kalashnikov
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,407 Senior Member
    Yep. And too bad we had a huge amount of gun owners who were willing to let the bump stocks get thrown under the bus in the hope they would not go after more. 

    Appeasing tyranny never works. 
    👍👍👍

    YEP!  and I’m guilty of this because I didn’t care about bump stocks but since then I figured out this was a psychological win for the left and I screwed up.

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,407 Senior Member
    Yep. And too bad we had a huge amount of gun owners who were willing to let the bump stocks get thrown under the bus in the hope they would not go after more. 

    Appeasing tyranny never works. 
    You would think that we'd have learned since NFA 1934 and all the legislation that came after it that compromising on rights doesn't work, it just emboldens those who seek to restrict. We give up part of our rights but get to keep an abridged version of liberty. So we don't get a total removal of freedom and convince ourselves it's a win. 
    EVERY civilization has operated as a race to a collapse based on the erosion of liberties on the people by Governments in a futile effort of keeping control of the masses.  Hell the Catholic religion was established in Rome as a futile effort to keep the crumbling empire united.  

    But invariably at some point in time the people invariably say, enough and break up into smaller likeminded groups and start again.  Have you seen the latest, rather public, calls for "Political Divorce"?  30 years ago you would have not heard this from anyone but the fringe as they whispered in dark corner and dimly lit meeting rooms...

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

  • Jeeper44magJeeper44mag Posts: 123 Member
    I've said for years, that every government has a size limit (population cap) beyond which, it will find itself unable to cater to (or provide for) the diversity therein.  I think we exceeded that size dozens of years ago (like in the 1920's or 30's) and that only the individual states rights have prevented a breakup already, since you can vote with your feet and move to a state that more closely matches your desired laws.   But as the Federal government seeks further and greater control, I forsee a shakeup of some sort eventually.

    What worked (and very well initially IMO) for 13 states, won't necessarily work for 50.   The primary advantages of a strong Federal government are that it prevents wars/strife between the states, promotes interstate commerce, and provides for the common defense (which should include economic defense from other countries).   

    Beyond these objectives however, the Federal government needs to basically keep it's nose out of everyone's business, and remain as small as possible.... and THAT isn't happening. 

    Luis
  • BigslugBigslug Posts: 9,859 Senior Member
    Seemed to me then, and seems to me now, that much effort is being spent on protecting a mechanically cheesy semantic workaround to the unconstitutional NFA34 that could be better spent on disposing of NFA34.  I can't see how fighting B.S. with more B.S. is an effective strategy. 
    WWJMBD?

    "Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
  • breamfisherbreamfisher Posts: 14,103 Senior Member
    edited March 3 #14
    Or, maybe, setting boundaries for an executive branch regulatory agency to... regulate based on the laws and not reinterpret the already written laws to meet the desires of the executive branch is a good thing because it reinforces the other Constitutional idea of separation of powers is a really good precedent to set.  Furthermore, it's probably more attainable, especially in the short term, to get a regulatory agency to roll back its overreach than to take a court case all the way to the Supreme Court to repeal a 89 year old law.

    I suppose the NRA has the money to do it, but being not really advocates, it doesn't seem they've been to eager to flex the muscle.  I mean, they even supported the bumpstock ban in the first place.
    Meh.
  • FreezerFreezer Posts: 2,753 Senior Member
    edited March 5 #16
    State rights? Look at Kaliforniastan! A law enforcement officer can buy and own, privately, any firearm they want. All guns must pass their drop test. "Assault weapons" have to meet their criteria, ammo is heavily taxed and municipalities have taxed the guns store so heavily that they were put out of business. 

    What about concealed carry permits? I can, almost, understand background checks, but, you only regulate the honest. Beyond the background check, there should be no law "requiring" training, insurance, or justifiable need, nor should it regulate you to carry a specific weapon. That should be left to the individual's good judgement and moral code. "Infringed"!

    Their Woke/political correctness infringes on the first amendment also! Hate speech? Really? The First Amendment gives you the right to disagree, be offended and to offend.

    We need one standard when it comes to our constitutional rights. "No person is entitled to title or privilege", "Shall not be infringed".

    The NRA has abandoned California and other states. Their overreach should have been in the Supreme Court years ago. It is partly responsible for the ATF's overreach. If the states can overstep the constitution, we can too! 

    I knew I shouldn't have read this thread!


    I like Elmer Keith; I married his daughter :wink:
  • Wambli SkaWambli Ska Posts: 5,407 Senior Member
    Californians have abandoned their state.  People vote in their own masters…

    It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎

Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement