It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
cpj wrote: »
Its simple. Because I ing want one.
Rights are not defined by "need."
So I should be able to own what the government has, Yes?
Razorbacker wrote: »
Before I left for work this morning, my girl and I were sharing coffee together and getting our morning dose of Fair and Balanced. The Colorado shooting is still the hot topic and she asked me why anyone would need a 50 round mag.
I told her that the word need should never enter the conversation regarding personal firearms ownership vis a vis gun laws. But to answer her question at face value I said something along the lines of suppose Zimmerman is acquitted and we have Rodney King like riots nationwide. Even right here in River City.
She thought for a minute and just said "Oh".
How would you folks answer that question?
If you don't have a C&R FFL,you really need to consider getting one----it's a license to spend money, though.
Nomadac wrote: »
Listening to Sen. Feinstein on Fox with Chris Wallace on Sunday demonstrated her lack of knowledge and facts when she was discussing Assault Weapons, etc. Her statements that AR 15's are one of the most deadly weapons compared to the shotgun he was carrying, in a crowded area leaves one question her knowledge of deadly weapons.
Temporary Price Reduction
Give a Gift
PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE
Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.