Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
robert38-55
Posts: 3,621 Senior Member
Ann Coulter..?? Is this the American Renaissance?
robert38-55
Posts: 3,621 Senior Member
I came across this article on the web this morning while searching for other articles. I read it. I like the opening statement, "We already know that guns don't kill people in either Detroit or Chicago,dangerous Black people do." (DUHHHH, last time I checked one doesn't have to be black to be a dangerous person, I knew some pretty dangerous white people at one time,not to mention other races).
As I continued to read the 2nd paragraph struck me as odd. It says: "Considering that the only people using guns to kill fellow citizens in New York City or Washington D.C. are Black people(well,throw in a few Hispanics)you quickly understand that gun violence in America is largely a Black phenomenon and that private citizens who are buying guns at record numbers do so to protect their persons,family and property primarily from Black people."
First off, I know white people kill other people too, don't matter what color ya skin is. Second people kill people and not always with guns...I read this article three times and after the third time I still feel like I am reading mixed signals..Is she advocating arming Blacks and other minorities? Armed revolt? Is she against White's and other law abiding citizens of the USA(opertive word here is CITIZENS) owning firearms? I consider myself a fairly good reader but, gals and pals, I am lost here. Maybe I could get some enlightenment here on this article. The article was published April 20,2012, it might be old, it might have been discussed here before, but never the less it's some good reading and discussion. The link to the article is below:
http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2012/04/ann-coulters-idea-for-american.html
PS. Our economic and current political situation is killing us every day,not instanstly like a gun can, but never the less it's still killing us.
As I continued to read the 2nd paragraph struck me as odd. It says: "Considering that the only people using guns to kill fellow citizens in New York City or Washington D.C. are Black people(well,throw in a few Hispanics)you quickly understand that gun violence in America is largely a Black phenomenon and that private citizens who are buying guns at record numbers do so to protect their persons,family and property primarily from Black people."
First off, I know white people kill other people too, don't matter what color ya skin is. Second people kill people and not always with guns...I read this article three times and after the third time I still feel like I am reading mixed signals..Is she advocating arming Blacks and other minorities? Armed revolt? Is she against White's and other law abiding citizens of the USA(opertive word here is CITIZENS) owning firearms? I consider myself a fairly good reader but, gals and pals, I am lost here. Maybe I could get some enlightenment here on this article. The article was published April 20,2012, it might be old, it might have been discussed here before, but never the less it's some good reading and discussion. The link to the article is below:
http://stuffblackpeopledontlike.blogspot.com/2012/04/ann-coulters-idea-for-american.html
PS. Our economic and current political situation is killing us every day,not instanstly like a gun can, but never the less it's still killing us.
"It is what it is":usa:
Replies
Jerry
Money is not speech, corporations are not people, and wealth does not trickle down.
Spoken like a true lunatic.
Jerry
That comment is below your usual.
We need to remember that Coulter, Limbaugh and others are basically entertainers.
They make outlandish statements and then sit back and watch the dollars roll in.
They don't have any accountabilty.
They sit back and wait for the comments of the choir that they're preaching to.
But that's OK. We need a balance.
Jim
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
:guns::guns::guns:
Jerry
Ann Coulter and Limbaugh are staunch conservatives, Beck is conservative with libertarian leanings and O'Reilly is a Neocon. You don't actually know much about them, as you just spout the same propaganda that comes out of commie networks like MSNBC.
...she's got armed bodyguards to deal w/ muggers, doesn't "everyone"???
.......................And so does Rosie 'O' Donnely!!!!!!
:agree::guns::worthy:
Got to agree with ya on this one Teach. When I lived in NC I live out in the country too. We had a few Black neighbors. I can't count the time we would go shooting. One of my good friends back there was one of those black neighbor,and an avid gun owner and gun nut like me and all the others here. As a matter of fact we shot together so often at one time we gained the nickname of some of the other folks there as the "Salt & Pepper" shooting team.:rotflmao:
I kind of got that same conclusion after reading that article three times.
I would conclude that the reason there are more white gunowners than Blacks is due to the fact at one time in this country, there were more white people than Black folks.I don't know for sure if most anti-gun laws in the U.S.A. have been motivated by keeping guns out of the hands of black persons, but any usleless anti-gun law is a ploy and a underhanded attempt to totally "Get the guns out of the United States." IIRC back in the late 1960's at the height of the Viet Nam protest in this country didn't the Black Panthers also advocate arming the Black race? Anyway the thing is, and this is what I believe: If you are a citizen of the USA, and have the legal right to "Own and Bear Arms", and one is an avid gun loving gun toting,shooting enthusist like all of us here, then by all means go buy yourself some guns and go shooting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Great movie, and I like the characters he portrayed.
But he's an entertainer, just like Coulter and Limbaugh.
They're not lunatics, they know where the money comes from.
To base your intelect on fictional characters is fantasy.
We can't make a rational decision while only listening to one part of the debate.
You obviuosly have a good brain, use it to make a rational (not emotional) decision.
Jim
Let's also remember that the strongest of the anti-gun laws exist in large population centers, where there are proportionally larger populations of black Americans. I'm of the opinion that it is a big part of the liberal agenda to keep black Americans dependent on government, just as Bigslug said earlier. No guns(self-defense), limited economic opportunity(self-reliance), lots of welfare handouts, plenty of excuses for poor judgement and decisions(self-determination), severely limited accountability, and the expectation that any independent thinking makes you a sellout to your race.
And those who prop themselves up as "leaders" in the 'black community' are complicit in the scheme; gutless leeches feeding off of ignorance & fear to make money and gain stature. I have no use for any of them. Except maybe as punch lines in jokes.
If so, you got to the bottom and should have been able to figure out that it is a liberal blog with a adgenda of disarmament.
As to Coulters comments, she hooked you into reading the artical with a line, that while sort of factual, is written in a way that you wouldnt expect. You go on to read the explanation.
As stated in my original post:
I am against any disarment of the American citizen. Always have been, always will be. Take away the guns from citizens of a country and especially in the USA, then we all become subjects and slaves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I did. I didn't read a lot of the posted comments though... The article is still somewhat interesting with a politcal twist.