Home Main Category Hunting

Good Results With IMR4007ssc

beartrackerbeartracker Senior MemberPosts: 3,116 Senior Member
I decided to work with IMR4007ssc in my 30-06 Marlin XL7 using my favorite bullet when hunting whitetail deer and hogs, the 165gr HPBT Sierra G/K

My load chain was:
165gr HPBT Sierra G/K
IMR4007ssc
Winchester Brass
Fed 210 Match primer
OAL 3.185"

Results:
Velocity - 2907fps average
Extreme spread - 13
Deviation - 5
Group size for three shots -

Target three shot group
[TgtGfx1_zpsb3a8bd1b.jpg

Increased the charge by 3/10 of a grain and average was 2938fps five shot group.

Target five shot group with 3/10gr increase.
TgtGfx2_zps6b1cb4b5.jpg


I liked how this turned out, will use IMR4007ssc with my 06 some more.

Replies

  • NNNN Senior Member Posts: 25,126 Senior Member
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Yeah, firs time NN I have used IMR4007ssc with a 30-06 and 165gr load, I am keeping this one.
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    knitepoet wrote: »
    Considering that velocity is faster than Hodgdon's max load with that powder with 165gr bullets (and from a shorter barrel) and Q/L showing that exact bullet/powder combo needs 66,000 + PSI to get your velocity from a 22" barrel... I'm glad it's going off next to YOUR face and not mine :nono:


    You never cease to amaze me by your limited experience of things because you get most of what you know from reading instead of doing. The top load I used is a near max load from Q/L I am not over book. I am not
    over pressure for this rifle and chamber, and extraction is easy and no other pressure signs. This 06 has always exceeded the velocities of my Ruger 22 inch barrel by at least 80fps on the average. Now let me let you go back to reading, which you are good at. I used 62500psi Q/L data not 66,000psi
  • BigDanSBigDanS Senior Member Posts: 6,992 Senior Member
    Those are two hundred yard groups? Impressive! .2 MOA!!!

    D
    "A patriot is mocked, scorned and hated; yet when his cause succeeds, all men will join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." Mark Twain
    Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.... now who's bringing the hot wings? :jester:
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    BigDanS wrote: »
    Those are two hundred yard groups? Impressive! .2 MOA!!!

    D


    No, they are only 100yds I put the wrong yardage number in the program when measuring the group
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Well, it appears that my load is close to your estimates and looking back at quick load I obviously did not use the software properly, but fortunately I worked up from 52.5 grains in half grains which I always start low because Q/l is only an estimator and I used other data books to get a starting place, and good thing I do start low with my loads. My top charge ended up being 56.0 grains which looks according to the info well above my desired 62,500psi. With the shallow grooves and lands of the Marlin I obviously build up pressure slower than in my Ruger, good thing. I don't have a problem with your opinions, You and I have always been opinionated. I truly thought you were wrong. You were closer to estimating my pressures than I was and this load even though it does not show up in my brass is obviously over my desire of 62,500 and fortunately not as high as your estimated 66,000psi, but still to high according to the data. Now if you would not mind, and are not to offended by my offensive statements to you, could you give me a near max load using your program and the limit being 62,500psi. I also apologize, you might read a lot, but seems that does give you the right knowledge in this case even above my experience which ain't so good in this case. Please take time to give your opinion again, by giving me a near max or limit when using this powder according to Q/L Thank you
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    To Paul and everyone on this forum, my comments to Paul were uncalled for and certainly not needed. I ask all of you to forgive as Paul said, my arrogance in handling this.

    Paul, I appreciate you taking the time to send me what you work up. Mike
  • ZeeZee Senior Member Posts: 27,464 Senior Member
    tumblr_mpcyi4LF0b1rk6p9mo1_500.gif
    "To Hell with efficiency, it's performance we want!" - Elmer Keith
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Ok Zee :) that is funny, I get it :)
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Well, I am left with going to my gunsmith friend and have him install a pressure gauge and we will test fire a round at 56.0 and see what ball park it is in. I am now curious and want to know. Fortunately he does this for free because we have been friends for years. I called him at home and he said bring it to him in the morning since he open until 12 noon and when he is ready Monday or Tuesday I will go and we will fire it. I think in doing so it will benefit us in comparing the reality against our estimation. Thanks for trying, I will let you all know the results. :)
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Hey thanks for the PM and I sent you two of them.

    Paul, I deleted the real dangerous load list that I sent you on PM in this public post and here is what I came up with when I did it and my barrel is really fast. Also, I will be checking out my chronograph by bring my other one and comparing. Lord I hope it is not off, but I will see.


    Cartridge : .30-06 Spring. (SAAMI)
    Bullet : .308, 165, Sierra HPBT 2140
    Useable Case Capaci: 62.677 grain H2O = 4.070 cm³
    Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.340 inch = 84.84 mm
    Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
    Powder : IMR 4007 SSC

    Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
    incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
    CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

    Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
    % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

    -20.0 77 45.36 2251 1856 31565 8043 86.9 1.437
    -18.0 79 46.49 2307 1949 33626 8306 88.2 1.400
    -16.0 81 47.63 2362 2044 35817 8564 89.4 1.365
    -14.0 83 48.76 2418 2142 38147 8816 90.5 1.327
    -12.0 85 49.90 2474 2242 40626 9062 91.6 1.287
    -10.0 87 51.03 2529 2344 43263 9301 92.6 1.249
    -08.0 89 52.16 2585 2448 46071 9531 93.6 1.212
    -06.0 91 53.30 2641 2555 49061 9752 94.5 1.177
    -04.0 93 54.43 2697 2664 52248 9964 95.4 1.143 ! Near Maximum !
    -02.0 95 55.57 2752 2776 55646 10165 96.1 1.110 ! Near Maximum !
    +00.0 97 56.70 2808 2889 59274 10354 96.8 1.078 ! Near Maximum !
    +02.0 99 57.83 2864 3005 63150 10532 97.5 1.047 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

    Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
    Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    +Ba 97 56.70 2936 3159 69526 10337 99.7 1.003 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
    Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
    -Ba 97 56.70 2642 2557 49257 9940 90.5 1.175
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Yes, I am highly curious now, it will be interesting indeed.
  • mbmmmbmm New Member Posts: 19 New Member
    Not that it has anything to do with this discussion, I use the same powder for my 220 swift and have used it for years and am very happy with it.. For what it is worth.
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Senior Member Posts: 8,496 Senior Member
    I am glad the fireworks are finished.
    Isn't that why you fight so you can kiss and make up? :)
    Just be glad you're shooting Mike.
    I don't feel good enough to do that, but I'm getting there.
    I need to get quick load one of these days, it seems like a really cool program.
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    He will not be free to do it until tomorrow afternoon and I will post results tomorrow evening.
  • RazorbackerRazorbacker Senior Member Posts: 4,646 Senior Member
    He will not be free to do it until tomorrow afternoon and I will post results tomorrow evening.

    I have followed this thread and look forward to your results. I've read here and elsewhere many times that quickload was off base. Real world results are what counts in my book.
    Teach your children to love guns, they'll never be able to afford drugs
  • tennmiketennmike Senior Member Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    If you have the spare change, one of these would be a useful tool when working up a load at the high end of the load data. I'd like one, but can't justify the purchase. I only load at the 'pedestrian' level at the low to middle of the data. The equipment sure has a lot of data available and many features that would give nice to know information, though.

    http://www.shootingsoftware.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=RSI&Category_Code=PT
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • snake284snake284 Senior Member Posts: 22,429 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    If you have the spare change, one of these would be a useful tool when working up a load at the high end of the load data. I'd like one, but can't justify the purchase. I only load at the 'pedestrian' level at the low to middle of the data. The equipment sure has a lot of data available and many features that would give nice to know information, though.

    http://www.shootingsoftware.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=RSI&Category_Code=PT

    I could almost justify one of those Tennmike. There's at least one load I would love to know about. Actually, I COULD justify it, but I don't have the change now. Not this time of year. But it is interesting.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
  • Ernie BishopErnie Bishop Senior Member Posts: 8,496 Senior Member
    Of course it is.
    knitepoet wrote: »
    Last time I checked, that's allowed here isn't it? :wink:
    Ernie

    "The Un-Tactical"
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Robert has run the test, I am tied up in counseling and he text me the results.

    165gr Sierra HPBT
    56.0grs IMR4007ssc
    59,189psi
    2848fps he said my chrony is off on the average of 59fps (will check this again at the range and compare to my back up crony)

    I can live with this load if it is 2848fps and my back up verifies Roberts chrony findings.
  • beartrackerbeartracker Senior Member Posts: 3,116 Senior Member
    Yes, it will do and I am leaving this load where it is. I do like this IMR4007ssc and also my extreme spread and deviation were low. If it bounces off anything I am hunting, I will take my dad's advice when he said, "It is a poor set of feet that stands around and takes abuse.":that:
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement