Home Main Category Second Amendment/Politics

Merrick Garland Supreme Court Justice ??

jaywaptijaywapti Senior MemberPosts: 5,051 Senior Member
Comments, I know nothing about him other than his involvement with the Oklahoma City bombing, what say ye ???

JAY
THE DEFINITION OF GUN CONTROL IS HITTING THE TARGET WITH YOUR FIRST SHOT

Replies

  • Make_My_DayMake_My_Day Senior Member Posts: 7,916 Senior Member
    He's probably a good judge, Harvard and **** Laude and all that, but he's not pro-gun and makes the moderate decisions, so I won't blame Republicans if they keep their promise not to hear or confirm anyone.
    JOE MCCARTHY WAS RIGHT:
    THE DEMOCRATS ARE THE NEW COMMUNISTS!
  • Big Al1Big Al1 Senior Member Posts: 8,548 Senior Member
    If Oblunder wants him I sure as hell don't!!
  • NNNN Senior Member Posts: 25,160 Senior Member
    Big Al1 wrote: »
    If Oblunder wants him I sure as hell don't!!
    :agree:
  • shootbrownelkshootbrownelk Senior Member Posts: 2,035 Senior Member
    I'm sure those two hammered out a deal of some sort. A lifetime job for some anti-2nd amendment opinions and siding with the other lefties.
  • ArmoredmanArmoredman Member Posts: 362 Member
    He is said to have a very anti 2A record, voted to let DC keep "gun-free" along with some others, reports are from Brietbart and other smaller outfits.
  • horselipshorselips Senior Member Posts: 3,628 Senior Member
    Just another radical progressive activist judge in moderate's clothing. I'm not fooled, I hope McConnell isn't either.
  • tennmiketennmike Senior Member Posts: 27,457 Senior Member
    I wouldn't trust Garland to guard the contents under an outhouse even if his lips were sewn shut. Anti 2A among other things; one of those that believe the Constitution is a 'living breathing document' that can be interpreted any way he wants no matter what the actual words of Constitution say. Don't need any judge on SCOTUS that will subvert the Constitution; we got 2 like that already.
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer”
    ― Douglas Adams
  • snake284snake284 Senior Member Posts: 22,429 Senior Member
    tennmike wrote: »
    I wouldn't trust Garland to guard the contents under an outhouse even if his lips were sewn shut. Anti 2A among other things; one of those that believe the Constitution is a 'living breathing document' that can be interpreted any way he wants no matter what the actual words of Constitution say. Don't need any judge on SCOTUS that will subvert the Constitution; we got 2 like that already.

    Actually you got more than two, you got four. Don't need 5. Don't really need one. And I don't think even the Devil can kill Ginsberg. She survived one of the most deadly cancers out there. Thomas and Kennedy are both getting old. John Roberts is iffy some times. He did stand up for the 2A but he flunked out on Gay Marriage and Obummer care. I guess one out of three is about as good as we can hope for from him.

    When Obummer starts telling everybody how the Senate should do what's right and confirm his choice I get sick in the stomach listening to his BS! He tells it like we need to drop our pants and let the devil cut off our family jewels. He had no intention of picking a conservative for the court. NO way no form. He picked a devil in disguise just like most of us here expected. Now the Senate must remain firm. Also we need a Republican in the White House.
    Daddy, what's an enabler?
    Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement