Home Main Category General Firearms

Didn't intend to buy another 1.....

2»

Replies

  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    RugerFan said:
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    RugerFan said:
    Based on what others have said I expected more from the magnum cylinder, and was surprised at how well the LR cylinder did. But, this was just a quick trip to see if it shot. Will try other ammo and see what happens .
    Did you get to try some WRF ammo?  It’s not WMR...
    Huh?
    I am pretty sure I see magnum on that cylander 
    I had to look it up. You can shoot wrf in wmr but not wmr in wrf. Wrf is between LR and WMR in length
    Correct.  Funny thing the box says do not use in Revolvers but it never used to.  I’ve been doing it for years to great effect.
  • earlyagainearlyagain Posts: 7,928 Senior Member
    I just checked the dimensions. Both are identical except length and a .001 neck variation. So headspace in the wheel is good to go.
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,777 Senior Member
    RugerFan said:
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    RugerFan said:
    Based on what others have said I expected more from the magnum cylinder, and was surprised at how well the LR cylinder did. But, this was just a quick trip to see if it shot. Will try other ammo and see what happens .
    Did you get to try some WRF ammo?  It’s not WMR...
    Huh?
    I am pretty sure I see magnum on that cylander 
    I had to look it up. You can shoot wrf in wmr but not wmr in wrf. Wrf is between LR and WMR in length
    Yea have been shooting it for years out of my 1888. Never tried them in the  22mag  hmmmm
    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    I just checked the dimensions. Both are identical except length and a .001 neck variation. So headspace in the wheel is good to go.
    Yep, the one on the left next to the .22 LR center and the Mag on the right.
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    edited November 2019 #36
    Diver43 said:
    RugerFan said:
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    RugerFan said:
    Based on what others have said I expected more from the magnum cylinder, and was surprised at how well the LR cylinder did. But, this was just a quick trip to see if it shot. Will try other ammo and see what happens .
    Did you get to try some WRF ammo?  It’s not WMR...
    Huh?
    I am pretty sure I see magnum on that cylander 
    I had to look it up. You can shoot wrf in wmr but not wmr in wrf. Wrf is between LR and WMR in length
    Yea have been shooting it for years out of my 1888. Never tried them in the  22mag  hmmmm
    What 1888?  It was introduced in 1890 for the Winchester pump rifle.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.22_Winchester_Rimfire
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,777 Senior Member
    GunNut said:
    Diver43 said:
    RugerFan said:
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    RugerFan said:
    Based on what others have said I expected more from the magnum cylinder, and was surprised at how well the LR cylinder did. But, this was just a quick trip to see if it shot. Will try other ammo and see what happens .
    Did you get to try some WRF ammo?  It’s not WMR...
    Huh?
    I am pretty sure I see magnum on that cylander 
    I had to look it up. You can shoot wrf in wmr but not wmr in wrf. Wrf is between LR and WMR in length
    Yea have been shooting it for years out of my 1888. Never tried them in the  22mag  hmmmm
    What 1888?  It was introduced in 1890 for the Winchester pump rifle.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.22_Winchester_Rimfire
    Correction 1890 second model. It's a little winchester pump take down rifle.

    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    Diver43 said:
    RugerFan said:
    Diver43 said:
    GunNut said:
    RugerFan said:
    Based on what others have said I expected more from the magnum cylinder, and was surprised at how well the LR cylinder did. But, this was just a quick trip to see if it shot. Will try other ammo and see what happens .
    Did you get to try some WRF ammo?  It’s not WMR...
    Huh?
    I am pretty sure I see magnum on that cylander 
    I had to look it up. You can shoot wrf in wmr but not wmr in wrf. Wrf is between LR and WMR in length
    Yea have been shooting it for years out of my 1888. Never tried them in the  22mag  hmmmm
    What 1888?  It was introduced in 1890 for the Winchester pump rifle.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.22_Winchester_Rimfire
    Correction 1890 second model. It's a little winchester pump take down rifle.

    Oh cool!  Yep that’s the one!!!  Great ammo and I wish they were still making guns for it.  I’d buy a new manufacture of those Winchester pumps in a heartbeat!  Maybe someone at Uberti is a listening 😁
  • Diver43Diver43 Posts: 12,777 Senior Member
    Back on topic, all the years I have had the Single Six w/mag cylinder, I never thought to use the  22wrf ammo. I have several boxes of it stashed for a rifle I cleaned, fixed a few things, shot it maybe 8 times and after meticulously cleaning it, put it in a sock and in the safe.
    Need to get the little revolver out and give it a try.  Mine is a tac driver with magnums and OK with LR.
    Logistics cannot win a war, but its absence or inadequacy can cause defeat. FM100-5
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    Most of mine have been that way.  That was the reason why I ended trying the WRF fodder in them, searching for something milder and more accurate to shoot out of my .22 Mag convertibles.  I’ve had great results with it over the years.  

    This also the reason why I ended up with an old pre-convertible Single Six in .22lr only.  At some point I intend to buy a newer single six and make it a dedicated .22 Mag gun.  Hoping someone with a lost .22lr cylinder will give me a great deal 😁
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    And BTW this is not a slight on Single Six convertibles at all.  Still one of the best (if not THE best) and most versatile rimfire revolvers our there and I love them.  With ammo they like they are darn fine shooters in .22lr.  They are just in my experience a little pickier than other dedicated .22 guns.
  • CHIRO1989CHIRO1989 Posts: 14,861 Senior Member
    That is my Single-Six, I love it, I missed 2 grouse with it last weekend, must have bumped the back sight, I picked up a holster for it off Rugers website..
    I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
  • bellcatbellcat Posts: 2,040 Senior Member
    That's a helluva deal!   Well done.
    "Kindness is the language the deaf can hear and the blind can see." Mark Twain
  • NNNN Posts: 25,236 Senior Member
    I like it, very nice

  • jbp-ohiojbp-ohio Posts: 10,943 Senior Member
    RugerFan said:
    No it's not marked. The store owner said it was based on the box.  I really didn't think it was an anniversary model since the gun isn't marked as such. 

    And now that I think about it the box doesn't say 50th anniversary.  It just has a label on the top with the dates 1953-2003. 

    But it doesn't matter. The anniversary part didn't matter to me at all. The price, barrel length, and just having a 2nd Single Six to give to each of my sons one day is what appealed to me.

    I'm glad you posted that. You confirmed my suspicion.
    For shooting, I'd rather have the adjustable sights anyway..........
    "The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not." Thomas Jefferson
  • RugerFanRugerFan Posts: 2,879 Senior Member
    That was another factor. I doubt I would have bought it if it didn't 

    I'll try to remember to post target pics tonight.
  • Great OutdoorsGreat Outdoors Posts: 326 Member
    Per the old days- you suck. Congrats on the find.
  • Great OutdoorsGreat Outdoors Posts: 326 Member
    I have a 1984 model, bought the month before my son was born, and he will get it when I die. Probably shot 50k through it over the years. 
  • RugerFanRugerFan Posts: 2,879 Senior Member
    Thank you.

     I, unfortunately,  haven't shot my other 1 near that much
  • RugerFanRugerFan Posts: 2,879 Senior Member
    This is 15 shots with the LR cylinder. 12 paces offhand. I was in a hurry. But, I don't shoot handguns all that well. 


  • RugerFanRugerFan Posts: 2,879 Senior Member
    Magnum cylinder. 15 rounds.


  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    That long throw of the hammer on a SA is hell on accuracy.  If your follow through is not flawless it’s tough to get the tiny groups.  Not bad for about 10 yards offhand!
  • rberglofrberglof Posts: 2,999 Senior Member
    Many years ago I bought a single six that appeared unfired but only had the magnum cylinder. Paid 75 dollars for it. Looks like I need to try wrf in it.
  • GunNutGunNut Posts: 7,642 Senior Member
    rberglof said:
    Many years ago I bought a single six that appeared unfired but only had the magnum cylinder. Paid 75 dollars for it. Looks like I need to try wrf in it.
    It’s fun, specially if you find the LRN loads!
Sign In or Register to comment.
Magazine Cover

GET THE MAGAZINE Subscribe & Save

Temporary Price Reduction

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Give a Gift   |   Subscriber Services

PREVIEW THIS MONTH'S ISSUE

GET THE NEWSLETTER Join the List and Never Miss a Thing.

Get the top Guns & Ammo stories delivered right to your inbox every week.

Advertisement