Home› Main Category› General Firearms
earlyagain
Posts: 6,779 Senior Member

The gun is a Colt 1991A1.
The recoil springs are from top to bottom. The original one that came with the gun in the early 1990's. The Wolff standard weight replacement installed when spent cases had firing pin drag marks on the primers. When was that? Who knows? I can't remember. The bottom one is a NIB Wolff standard weight 16.0 lbs spring.
Notice the difference in length. What does that mean? I have absolutely no idea. I guess they lose power and get shorter with use.
So when do you change them? At regular intervals? How many rounds? Heck if I know.
Here's what I do know. Last outing, my son and I put 200 rounds through it. Add that with two other trips for 2019 at fifty to 100 rnds per trip. That's 400 rounds for the year. Maybe. Mostly handloads. Loaded to moderate velocity, one at time with scale weighed powder charges, and crimped with a Lee FCD..
Unless the local sages here advise me otherwise. I'll probly just replace that center spring when spent primers show fp drag marks again.
I did buy more than one NIB replacement spring just to have them.
Wisedom, myth, lore, BS???
Recoil spring wisedom, myth, lore, and BS?


The gun is a Colt 1991A1.
The recoil springs are from top to bottom. The original one that came with the gun in the early 1990's. The Wolff standard weight replacement installed when spent cases had firing pin drag marks on the primers. When was that? Who knows? I can't remember. The bottom one is a NIB Wolff standard weight 16.0 lbs spring.
Notice the difference in length. What does that mean? I have absolutely no idea. I guess they lose power and get shorter with use.
So when do you change them? At regular intervals? How many rounds? Heck if I know.
Here's what I do know. Last outing, my son and I put 200 rounds through it. Add that with two other trips for 2019 at fifty to 100 rnds per trip. That's 400 rounds for the year. Maybe. Mostly handloads. Loaded to moderate velocity, one at time with scale weighed powder charges, and crimped with a Lee FCD..
Unless the local sages here advise me otherwise. I'll probly just replace that center spring when spent primers show fp drag marks again.
I did buy more than one NIB replacement spring just to have them.
Wisedom, myth, lore, BS???
Replies
I do know that a firing pin spring that snaps in half can cause you failure to strike.
Best way to judge wear is by comparing ejection with a new spring to what you have with the old. Since you have all those springs handy right now, it's easy to get that education.
I like to run the 18.5# springs myself with the beefy FP springs and full power (23# IIRC) mainsprings. The guns seem happier that way with full power, GI food, and I figure it will have to wear A LOT to get to the point of having less resistance than a worn out 16# standard spring. I've tinkered briefly with that spring combo with dialed back 200 grain loads and it ran fine.
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
I thought about getting the heavier recoil springs. But I dont ever use hot ammo. All my handloads are lighter than factory. And standard factory 230gr ammo is as hot as I go.
Edit.
Just realised. Ive never replaced the plunger tube spring.
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again! -- Mark Twain
Thats exactly where my gun throws the brass.
I'll keep the 18.5 pound springs in mind. Two guys on here advocating them. They're only 2.5 lbs heavier than what I'm using.
I used to think close up visits with owls were a bad omen. I found out that was bs, but Canadian geese should be avoided.
How easy it is to make people believe a lie, and [how] hard it is to undo that work again! -- Mark Twain
Native American lore.
Likely based in fact, as raptors screeching at you is hard to interpret as good.
I don't shoot enough for a note in the can like Elk Creek. But handloading does help me with making a close estimate of rounds fired.
"If you get it and didn't work for it, someone else worked for it and didn't get it..."
1. There's some thought out there that .45ACP was originally a launch pad for a 200 grain bullet; the 1911 16# spring spec MAY have originated from that, and the Army insisted on 230 grain at some point in the process because they were still trying to maintain the old .45 Peacemaker's ability to fell a horse.
2. Colt and Browning both knew that the military trials would include mud testing, sand testing, lack of lube testing, and all kinds of heinous things intended to make guns fail. 16 pounds of resistance would be easier to power through with all that gak in the gun than 18 pounds or more.
So I figured that if you ARE running anything near standard pressure 230 grain and you are NOT subjecting the pistol to a RIDICULOUS amount of powder or environmental fouling, the 18.5's are probably the ticket. The perceived difference is like that between a car suspension working within it's limits vs. one that's bottoming out on the same bump.
"Nothing is safe from stupid." - Zee