Home› Main Category› General Firearms
41magnut
Senior MemberPosts: 1,216 Senior Member
Opinions Please

Gentlemen,
Considering a change in my hunting armament.
First consideration - platform ?
Light weight, bolt action hunting rifle < 6.5 lbs before optics/ammo/sling, with a goal of 9# kitted out. Planned optics (already in inventory) is Trijicon AccuPoint 4-16X50
24" barrel maximum, 22 minimum.
Composite stock
LA vs SA - I have no preference between the two & ultimately cartridge selection (another discussion) will drive that choice.
Not interested in boutique makers, but I'm flexible. $1900.00 street price is my goal, but really would like to keep it under $1100.
Two that are under consideration,
Kimber Mountain Assent or Hunter
Savage 110 Ultralight.
I'd like to hear your personal experiences with various rifles.
Thank you in advance for your replies.
Considering a change in my hunting armament.
First consideration - platform ?
Light weight, bolt action hunting rifle < 6.5 lbs before optics/ammo/sling, with a goal of 9# kitted out. Planned optics (already in inventory) is Trijicon AccuPoint 4-16X50
24" barrel maximum, 22 minimum.
Composite stock
LA vs SA - I have no preference between the two & ultimately cartridge selection (another discussion) will drive that choice.
Not interested in boutique makers, but I'm flexible. $1900.00 street price is my goal, but really would like to keep it under $1100.
Two that are under consideration,
Kimber Mountain Assent or Hunter
Savage 110 Ultralight.
I'd like to hear your personal experiences with various rifles.
Thank you in advance for your replies.
"The .30-06 is never a mistake." Townsend Whelen :iwo:
Replies
"The Un-Tactical"
Mike
N454casull
Paul
Another savage in .17 hmr that also is accurate. They tend to be much more accurate than their price point would suggest Accurate rifle at a good price leave more dollars for glass and ammo
LMAO....My wife would not agree with my statement.
The barrel on my Kimber has an extremely thin contour. It makes it very light. But, the barrel is too thin to be threaded (without further shortening the barrel - not sure how much).
Since I think suppressed hunting rifles are the future, I wasn’t willing to buy another Hunter.
Caliber is still under consideration. I have my personal historical preferences but nothing is 100%.
I am considering a couple of cartridges that in the past I was Luke warm about, both 7mm.
A couple of the faster 6.5s have whispered in my ear, & I have a 6.5 CM that I have a lot of confidence in.
Not particularly interested in a belted magnum or anything over a 30 cal., unless of course I change my mind.
Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
Watch out, this guy is a closet .270 guy. He says this stuff as a diversion, LOL!!!
Son that's somebody with nothing to do with his time but keep me in trouble with mom.
I will admit the 270 WSM, as well as other WSM has caught my attention. Rifle selection is limited in these cartridges which limits my interest.
Ok, here are the current leaders in cartridge selection,
7MM
280 Remington
280 A.I.
7MM-RM*
6.5MM
6.5 PRC
6.5 Wby RPM**
30
30/06
300 WM*
300 WSM
* see posting about changing my mind about belted magnum. SS3 has a R-700-7RM that I like, as such added for consideration. I suppose if I'm will to consider the 7-RM, I should allow the 300-WM into the academic discussion.
**The Mark V Backcountry (5.4 lbs) cataloged in 280 AI & 6.5 W-RPM - finding one available for purchase ??. I own a Wby Mk-V TTR chambered in 308W which I like. The rife (22" #4 contour barrel) weighs 8#s
"The Un-Tactical"
I was hot for the 6.5 PRC & other .264" offerings in the beginning, but have cooled off since it's introduction. Compare & Contrast between 30 cal & 7MM has been interesting,
I have been a 30 cal fan-boy for the majority of my adult life, hey, an old dog can learn new tricks.
After further review my thoughts were that a hunting rifle, hopefully fired once, maybe twice, Heaven forbid three times, the barrel profile is less of a concern. One reason the Kimber remains under consideration.
I love my suppressors, and will continue to use them in the box blind, prairie dog town, or other venues that do not require long walks & possibly packing out on foot large pieces of animal.
I have decided to forego the heavier profile barrel required that use of the can would require for this build to save a lb or two (oz=lb=pain). Because of my sever hearing loss & to allow communications with hunting companions, I wear electronic ear-pro while hunting, the advantages of my suppressors is negated.
Personally, I would save even more $ and go with the Hunter you mentioned in .280AI. I do like the Savage in the same caliber more, but it would depend on street price.
280AI would be my choice
"The Un-Tactical"
https://www.sako.fi/rifles/sako-85/85-finnlight
Reuters, Dec 2020.
I wonder which model replaced it?
Sako doesn't catalog the current leader in today's leading cartridge choice. The platform does deserve consideration.
https://www.kimberamerica.com/montana
Don't you have a Montana in 7-08?
Just proved I'm not as search-literate as I thought.