Home› Main Category› Second Amendment/Politics
CHIRO1989
Posts: 14,844 Senior Member
Does anyone recall this case in court?

Does anybody recall the case of the individual that had a semiautomatic firearm go full auto on him while at the range and was convicted of having a machine gun? I think the case started in Wisconsin.
I take no pleasure in the death of the wicked, but rather that they turn away from their ways and live. Eze 33:11
Replies
Yes, the NFA and the machine gun ban is unconstitutional. But until they're overturned, we're going to have to live with what we have.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Olofson
https://web.archive.org/web/20090213170716/http://www.jsonline.com/news/wisconsin/29561634.html
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎
The conviction was not because he modified the firearm - seems they couldn't prove that. But he was convicted of knowingly trying to transfer a machine gun.
Not really, actually I've found quite a few conversations about that on the net. It is a possibility that as you mentioned, usually happens when you mix/match parts without understanding the inner works of the gun, and the solution is simple, a lighter recoil spring/lighter buffer to get it to cycle properly.
They are not machine guns, they have no prohibited full auto parts in them, only legitimate semi-auto parts, they are just malfunctioning guns that need tuning. Now if he willfully built it that way, leaves it as is and then tries to sell it like the guy above that is a whole different story.
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎
"The prosecution also provided evidence from Olofson's computer with proof of acquiring M-16 parts, which could be used to make an AR-15 automatic. Olofson also "had contact with vigilante groups" and indicated he was "part of the sovereign movement", according to U.S. Assistant Attorney Gregory Haanstad."
He knew exactly what he had and was trying to sell it as such...
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎
It’s a °IIIII° thing 😎